Describing how much those cuts that I already referenced are, doesn't magically make the remainder less than 100%. That's not how math works. C is 100% of C, regardless of the values of A & B. Telling me what A & B are doesn't magically make C less than itself.
Having said that, the point I was making had nothing to do with which method may or may not be more profitable to Rito. If anything, I imagine there may be some hidden transaction fee that you're intentionally overlooking, thus making the discrepancy smaller than you claim.
No, what I'm saying is the money Rito makes goes entirely into themselves. They don't need to pay a manufacturer, they don't need to pay a distributor, they don't need to pay a supplier. Only employee salaries. Which from my understanding, they have a very large number of unpaid interns handling a disturbing amount of their work, so even that cost is very low.
Rito has a disgusting amount of money to throw around, yet they settle for 3rd-rate quality, whilst insisting on pretending they're a small indie company.