http://na.op.gg/champion/statistics
While in NA? I think
https://champion.gg/champion/Ahri/Middle?
52.13% winrate
Probably shouldnt balance champs around bad players? I dont want my champ getting nerfed because bad players cannot learn how to play against her lol.
Then you guys whine when Sej gets nerfed, maybe she is just a REALLY strong champ but you guys arent using her correctly? I think this is something NA has to learn, git gud.
"winrate doesn't matter"
"X champion's winrate is higher then Ahri, they need to be gutted"
"Ahri's winrate is lower then X champion, she needs heavy buffs"
"Ahri's winrate and pickrate are the highest in the game, but that doesn't matter because winrate isn't important"
"Ahri's winrate is dropping to still be higher then most champions in the game, she needs heavy buffs because winrate matters now"
Are you bipolar? you say one minute ahri is overpowered the next moment you say shes balanced the main reason her wr dropped was due to the high popularity she receives. League of graphs also puts her at 53 and lolalytics puts her at an astounding 54% with about a 14% pickrate I honestly feel like you were nit picking the winrate so she would not look bad. Also Champion.gg is confirmed by rito to not have correct stats. So yeah. Uhh basically thread point denied? because you sorta were nitpicking websites and the highestwinrate one is known to be good from the playerbase. You also know that site mainly draws from High elo?
Also the best ahris get 59% w/r in diamond + take a champion like annie whos also garbage but then look at her best players and you get 60% but guess what? Since ahri has a higher fanbase she gets more players so her numbers for that are gonna be lower. So while we look at it statistically ahri > annie but I almost over never see anyone complain about annie. You complain ahri has no damage that shes useless/cant carry etc why else would she have these large numbers? Maybe try to focus on improving rather then complaining about ahri and qq.
You gotta take those statistics with a grain of salt. Every aggregate has slightly varying numbers because they all pull data differently. Lolalytics shows Ahri having a 53% win rate in Korea. Which one is right? Who knows. Riot won't give out their internal data.
good, quality topic here
buff inc followed by another 3 skin lines where she "coincidentally" fits in
50% ±1% is perfect
######(edit) oops accidentally buffed an ahris thread
She isn't even on Meddler's radar atm :|
If you were playing her as much as you type on this board you'll be a god.
Thats what i said about zed but guess what electrocute got nerfed hes sitting at a 49 percent winrate and people still complain about him
Thanks for the calcul.
But you're wrong about your conclusion. If ahri miss charm it's the window Zed goes in and kill Ahri or at least trade ult. It's not a "wait 12 secondes retry" Burst is more valuable than sustained damage on a same number, weaving 5 auto-attack, 3R and sometime Q return is long and shouldn't be look with the same eyes. I do know Zed fall off compared to mage and it's compasted by beeing stronger early. But my whole point wasn't about the Zed Ahri matchup. Zed can kill with much less counterplay, not be required to land shurken and few of his bug made this champion no longer considered high skillfloor and there where the hate come from.
Ahri is equal to any other champion. If she needs a nerf she will get a nerf,if she needs a buff she will get a buff. Winrate doesn’t mean anything. Don’t even try it.
