HEY RIOT! WE NEED 8 BANS! NOT 6!

Battlecast Bear·4/8/2016, 10:23:04 PM·6 votes·625 views

[slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] 130 champions on the roster now....and still only 6 bans? .....seriously? seriously? only 6? I could maybe understand if the roster was between like 50-80 champs, BUT 130!?!??!?

That leaves 122 champions still open!!!! ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY TWO!!!

Seriously we need 2 more bans! I know people in higher ranks don't have a freaking problem when it comes to bans because everyone is playing all the meta champs and half of them are already banned by each other but here in the low levels when you ban 6 but still leave open all the 'baby's first champs' like Yi, Fizz, Yas, Amumu, and the rest of the low level god tier roster you're really screwing us over!

"Oh but 8 bans would just make it so people would have to buy more champions and learn them!"

ISN'T THAT THE POINT OF HAVING SO MANY CHAMPIONS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? IT'S CALLED A DIVERSE ROSTER!! AND PEOPLE KEEP PLAYING THE SAME FREAKING 10 CHAMPS AT THIS LOW LEVEL AND WE CAN'T EVEN BAN 4 OF THEM BECAUSE NO ONE AGREES ON WHO TO BAN!!

[slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused] [slayer-jinx-unamused]**[slayer-jinx-unamused]

4 Comments

CreamyManCandy4/8/2016, 10:26:02 PM1 votes

130 champions

6 bans

124 champions to choose

10 players

meaning that there'll be one less for the next person to choose since it's draft

Which leaves... 114 champions

with 8 bans...

It'll leave

122 champions left...

10 players...

112 champions unchosen..

In my honest opinion, 5 bans per team is necessary one ban for each player.

Happy Jack4/8/2016, 10:41:00 PM1 votes

I would say less bans. 4 total.