Can we just all agree

OldDirtay·Aug 10, 2015·3 votes·347 views

that not only sated devourer as an item is just broken

not only that but promotes the same toxic mentality of just afk farming your jungle and leaving your team to die like feral flare did?

3 Comments

Cogito Ergo Sol Aug 10, 20152 votes

You are kinda right but you are wrong at the same time. Sated devourer right now bring toxic in the game because compared to all the other jungle items is just way to strong, and it need to be tuned down, that passive is just a big middle finger to all the champions except the junglers. This said, you are wrong because, yes, you must farm, but not afk farming. Old sated granted stacks for camps, this one even for kills or assists. So yes, it want you to farm, but you need to gank still.

Posui GartAug 10, 20151 votes

I think Rito's idea was to balance farming and ganking. Previously with old devourer(after its nerfs) it was "no ganks=useless". Now if you think your team can survive 20 min without much ganks-you can go farm. The only problem with devourer now is that it is too strong on some junglers, and too weak on others. Nocturne was a good devourer jungler, and where is he now? And Yi with Shyvana can now go 1x3 after sated+botrk, and the only thing able to kill them 1x1 is another jungler with sated(Or fed mage with CC, like Malzahar )

Other viable strategies are teamfighting with item 3725 , or counterjungling with item 3711 (joke, this item is not viable now)

OldDirtayAug 10, 20151 votes

riots ideas never pan out lol, and honestly it shouldnt take months to years for them to realize this before anything gets done

how does the community know some people are legit broken with this item and it promotes a bad mentality in regard to their teams before riot does?

not only that but why would you make a pretty much feral flare 2 where they agree'd it was broken and promoted this bad style of playing where it takes even less time to aquire while also adding a "double hit" type passive on it instead of leveling up the dmg per camp?

honestly it makes me sad when i think who thought of this as a good idea? what makes me even more sad is there must have been other people at the meeting saying good idea!

its like they make a mistake, take months to realize it before doing anything, then they put it in the freezer for a couple months then rerelease it with a new name and have it be more broken than the first....i just dont get it