"high win rate doesn't mean anything if the pick rate is low"
"the only people playing the champ are the mains of this champ"
" lee win rate doesn't mean anything because he has a high pick rate"
lol of course
"the only people playing the champ are the mains of this champ"
" lee win rate doesn't mean anything because he has a high pick rate"
lol of course
People will always twist statistics to favor their argument..
Except your title and statements are not on conflict, they're literally the same sequence of logic.
[zombie-brand-facepalm]
[{quoted}](name=Dominick Destine,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xZ64jf0W,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-01-20T23:18:58.160+0000)
Except your title and statements are not on conflict, they're literally the same sequence of logic.
[zombie-brand-facepalm]
glad im not the only one who noticed that.
if a low % pickrate means that only dedicated mains play a champion and hence his winrate is higher, then it makes sense when a champion is played in 30% of the games by any noob, his overall winrate is much lower and doesnt reflect the actual strength of the champion on halfway decent mains.
Statements without context don't mean anything.
What if there were only one game played on Lee Sin? Regardless of whether or not it was a win or loss, it wouldn't have a whole lot of meaning. All statistics only make sense if they are taken in context with the data from which they are derived and it is unfortunately very common for people to take statistics out of context - not just in League, but in real life.