Please help me develop my point better
Let me give you some background info. Me and 4 of my friends compete together in a LoL team at our school. Our support just began to main support, and does not have many support champions, and mainly just plays Leona. I used to main support, as well as adc, so I do have a bit more experience on this topic
We were discussing our champ pools, and me and our adc suggested Thresh. Our support does not want to play Thresh, because he says that he and Leona fill the same role, which he says is a kill lane, but Leona does it better, so why play a sub-par champ.
There are a few points I have against his statement.
-
I believe Thresh has more kill potential than Leona if he is played well.
-
Even if Thresh has less kill potential, he brings in so much utility, and is useful in many more situations than Leona is.
-
Since we play together and are able to communicate out loud, I believe it gives Thresh even more potential to make plays than Leona ever could.
-
Thresh's skills can be used in many different ways, where as Leona can really only initiate and set up kills.
When I made these points he said that even if Thresh is "above average" in alot of ways, he would rather have someone who is really good at one thing. He said that there are supports who outclass Thresh in every aspect of support champs (sustain, poke, kill) and that He would rather just pick a support that is good in the team comp we choose.
DO you think I am right, or do you think it's better to have a champ be really good at one thing?