An Alternative to the Upcoming Sightstone Change
https://i.gyazo.com/18c488cf15b6293932c45fbf6634ea4b.png
First and foremost, I'm not worried about the upcoming change. I'm mostly interested to try it out and see how it feels. But I know a lot of people in the community are freaking out, and wanted to give it some thought.
I just played this game as support and had a vision score of 85. Even in games that don't last as long, my vision score is usually pretty high whether I buy a sightstone or not, and if it's not reflected in my vision score, I'm doing something to gain vision like using teemo shrooms which grant a lot of map awareness without counting toward your score.
My point is, with trinkets and control wards (and now klepto which grants extra rng vision), sightstone isn't necessary as a tool to gain proper vision control. With the uproar about the current changes to support items, I offer this alternative...
Still get rid of sightstone. Don't change support item quests or passives. Still allow the Eye of... items as separate tier 3 options but only with a 1000 gold upgrade (or whatever amount would make sense) without a sightstone built into it for lategame warding when teams run out of item slots to buy control wards.
Everyone - players & Riot alike - agree that support quest rewards are good. Currently Riot wants to potentially move them to new items so that the sightstone wards can replace them on current support items. I genuinely don't feel like the sightstone wards are actually necessary in order to establish effective vision control. In fact, with trinket timing on cooldowns, removing sightstone all together for the early game encourages players to use their wards more purposefully. You have to really consider timing and effectiveness of placing your wards. Supports & ADCs will need to work together to provide vision for their lanes, and jungles will really consider when to ward in the jungle or help a laner out with some extra vision.
That is my proposal.
Thoughts and discussion welcome. Rude and ignorant responses are not.