Riot Moral Writers are full of hypocrisy. Pyke, sure: ) Janna , Nami - oh no.

They act as if everything after season 2 has been forgotten when we live and play in a time where people refer to the past more than ever whenever they release or remake champions.

They continue to nerf Janna since last fall because her passive went to high and 6 seasons ago she had too much damage on her kit. Nami can't use her w on minions because that would enable her to lane VIABLY .... yet pyke is built to do just the opposite and more IN OR AWAY from bottom lane as a support class. Seems sexist to me that he can delete a 4 item vayne with two support items and 2 ad items....

Hello? LIke , if you are going to put out that shit at least don't deny other support with DAMAGE ratios to do that same. How about a 210% AP ratio on Nami wave? Or a linear , increasing ratio on Janna w/q ? They say they do not like to define roles and their creativity, but where else can you take Janna and Nami without pissing off your teammates? They were even excluded from the mages update earlier this year, which is BS because Zyra and Morgana and Brand WERE included . A mage is a mage, and just because they present a pacifist/delicate/suave theme shouldn't keep them from going into other roles or keep them from doing potent damage -- put a leash on pyke or his cc, because there is no explanation for today's day and age to have such a long cooldown for nami q and no burst like pyke when her abilities are much harder to coordinate if she were to go full magic damage.

Such a shame.