singed support smite
there is a lot of talk on the unfairness of the singed which is facing permanent ban. my challenge to you is to refute everything that created a very toxic game if you are going to say he is in deserving of a ban. reguardless of the message they sent this is what was happening in his games and why it lead to his ban.
-
taking his own junglers camps as a support.
-
proxying lane minions of other lanes robbing exp of whoever was in that lane .
-
never building for support , teamfights are now hardly manageable.
-
leaving bot lane 2v1
the way singed was playing he forcefully pushed every single one of his allies into the dirt so that he can absorb some of there power onto his self and make a super powered singed. he a veteran of the game and there are some things you know being an lol player that is not acceptable. its not acceptable to take your junglers farm, que support and do nothing for the role, troll every lane , and do zero team fighting. sure maybe some people do one of those things on occasion but who do you know that does every single one of them in every game and wouldn't get ban?
my point to refute any arguments that singed was limited in his gameplay is this, the singed can actually play exactly the same way he is playing and not get ban riot has made even this toxic gameplay completely possible and even gave you a way to select this kind of gameplay its called jungler. so if the singed has the ability to play exactly how he wants to play in a game simply by changing title before the match starts why do you as this singed not just take the road that doesn't forcefully make your 4 teammates a sacrifice to make you stronger. i am all for off - meta but when it makes everyone of your allies guaranteed to be weaker from what you are doing i don't think that is a fair strategy for you to use. logic can easily tell you that if you are going to do off-meta that causes allies to suffer then it should only be 2 at max leaveing 3 to reap the benefits so that you still stay on the side of more positive because 3 is greater than 2.
some people even compare this strategy to "being out of the norm in society" and forced to "conform". this is a all 4 one strategy and i don't see how the maturity of people having hardship to make it easier on the select few is any different than how society works currently except in society you can often times climb out of being on the bottom to the top, with this singed his teammates were forced to be lower classed citizens and to pay taxes to singed without representation . THE BAN IS JUSTIFIED. if you want to refute the ban then refute it properly be addressing everything he did wrong and also give any kind of example where someone does all the things he does in one game and would not suffer the same consequences.