With so many Champions, why not allow more bans???

Synthetyx·5/31/2016, 2:53:49 PM·5 votes·622 views

There is what, 152 champions now. (If they stopped there, it would be a hilarious reference BTW)

With that many available champions to choose/ban in draft, why not increase the ban to 5? Allowing each player to make the ban of their choice, or banning the biggest potential threat to their team comp.

I'm not posting to lash out on Riot by any means, or to start raging about something that happened in a game, this is a legit post to offer a thought, in hopes Riot at least sees this......

Thank You and Have a Great Day![slayer-jinx-wink]

5 Comments

I am Pacman5/31/2016, 4:02:29 PM2 votes

There are only 131 champions but I agree we do need more bans.

https://reignofgaming.net/2016/05/30/riots-reluctance-to-increase-ban-limit-by-stonewall008/

venomous frost5/31/2016, 2:55:44 PM1 votes

Because the amount of champions that are broken enough to ban does not scale with the amount of available champions. but yeah i don't see a problem with 1ban/player

FiddlesOnTheRoof5/31/2016, 2:58:33 PM1 votes

It makes perfect sense to me. Every player gets to play one of their two main roles, AND gets to ban a champion they don't want to see. Would also allow riot to have more fun with champion balance because there are enough bans to cover over tuned champions

MotrColt5/31/2016, 3:44:23 PM1 votes

Because they would be used on the same champions every game. Instead of having Zed perma banned, fizz almost always banned, malz almost always banned, etc. All those almost always banned champion would turn into perma bans. They would never sneak through instead of seldom