[Discussion] Recent and Upcoming Champions vs. Current Meta

Nova Skye··1 votes·284 views

((OP's note: This is not a bash Riot thread, or one asking for anything in particular. This is some observations I've made and I want to know if you guys see the same thing. Thanks in advance for playing nice!))

I am relatively new to the boards. I don't hover here except when I'm working and don't have time or flexibility to hop into a game during breaks. However, in my limited time here, I've seen numerous posts both "from" Riot and "at" Riot about trying to create strategic diversity.

I've been thinking about the champs that have recently been released verses the current meta. These are some observations (and I believe some of this came from other threads or champ notes, but I'm not sure). Please note that every thought should probably have a "supposedly" in front, and each thought is based on the fact that there is a direct "safety" mechanic built in for learning curves (usually escapes, but sometimes in very specific abilities like Rek'Sai's burrowed vision). It should also be noted that each of these champions seem to have an extremely large learning curve for being what I've dubbed "learning" champions.

Gnar GNAR

  • Teaches ___ how to tank
  • Teaches new melees how to melee (and still have a range to fall back on)

Kalista KALISTA

  • Teaches ADCs how to kite
  • Teaches Duo lane how to communicate

RekSai REK'SAI

  • Teaches Jungles how to gank

((Upcoming)) BARD

  • Teaches Supports how to roam

What I want to discuss is this:

  1. Do you see these trends like I do?
  2. Do you think the learning curve on these makes these trends feasible?
  3. Do you think these trends are supporting the current meta or allowing diversity (and if the latter, through what means do you think this diversity will come? IE, through knowledge, or through Bard starting to roam with Jungle, bringing back the duo Jung / single lanes I've heard so much about?)

2 Comments

Mimy1 votes

Sure they teach you how to do stuff, but how are new players supposed to play them in order to learn from them?

Isnt that sorta what 450 champions are for? being cheap enough for new players to learn them and then learn the role they play them as?

Most 450 champions are usually champions that don't much skill BUT, these champions listed above, although they do seem like it.. They have skill shots and other things that may require some skill to use.. Not saying that 450 champions dont have skillshots but You dont have to catch a boomerang.

Nova Skye1 votes

I "mostly" agree with you. However, I feel like these champs are not so much for "new players" as much as for "players new to roles". I've heard so much "I suck as support" - well then, learn Bard, and you will learn the mechanics of what a basic support should do.

However, where I'm concerned is that while these champs have the perfect "learning tools" for roles, they seem to be incredibly hard to pick up (like you said, skill shots or similar). Yet they have effective escapes, like Rek'sai. Failed gank? Tunnel away and try again later. Kalista: Failed kiting experience? Ult your support and run like mad. Gnar: Megagnar got you in trouble? Do all the damage you can (after all, you can take it) and then bounce out as soon as you go mini. No, these champions are not easy, but the techniques are so basic.

More from Gameplay

More by Nova Skye