Another "why isn't this S rank" post... and the why.

Linked in this is the result of a game. yes I know he's cheesy, but I like him, and he's not TOO cheesy.

anyways I am rank 5 on him and have had terrible luck getting the S's necessary to hit rank 6. I have 1 in my inventory now. This game was about as one sided as you could get without becoming dull. it was great. before 12 minutes in I was 7/0. I kept playing and of course we won, with 3 people on the team getting S rank.

I was not one of them.

Not only was I 9/0/16 (over 50% kill participation) but I was also warding (notice: ward knife) and present for most tower destructions. So how was this not an S rank.

Because I was playing a tank.

One of the biggest metrics in the game for rank generating is damage done. i was 4th in that stat, only ahead of .

Heres the thing, I built full tank, most of my damage was from anti-autoattacking and , with some hefty Auto attacks due to my passive. I wasn't there to do damage though. I was a tank, I was there to pin down their carries and take damage.

It seems unfair to tanks that they are forced to do damage to get an S rank when they are being useful to their team without it.

Can't we make it that when you pick tank the metric doesn't count the damage done, or at least counts it less. Like we do when someone picks support.

One last thing: lets all giggle that had a score of 6/6/6