Can we stop saying Gnar has sustain?
His passive grants him hp upon transformation but it brings you back to the same %hp after turning back. I've seen way to many people say he has sustain. Just a little note.
His passive grants him hp upon transformation but it brings you back to the same %hp after turning back. I've seen way to many people say he has sustain. Just a little note.
People who are concerned about Gnar should refocus. Sion is stronger at every stage of the game.
strongly disagree
Well, his health regen also increases and it's the highest in the game (especially on higher levels), so he does have some sustain.
You're forgetting the base health regen increase
Vlad wrecks Gnar.
but ya, one could call it sustain.
Ex: mini gnar with 250/1000 hp transforms gaining 500 hp, making 750/1500, takes no damage while big, transforms back to mini gnar, now has 500/1000. (not real numbers, just throwin out an example)
Add on the fact, gnar can start Doren blade, could have Lifesteal runes, gains increased HP regen in mega, and has no Mana (only needs HP pots).
plenty of room to argue there is some form of Sustain to Gnar in lane.