[{quoted}](name=Emmy Cha0s,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=klJ1yPMa,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-11-12T23:45:28.870+0000)
Oh look, another winrate sheeple!
News flash: Sona has ALWAYS had an Artificially-Inflated winrate. Would it interest you to know that the average games that Sona is picked into is 6, yes 6 whole divisions lower than the global average ranking for where characters are picked. It's pretty fucking easy to abuse genuine noobs when you're playing 6 ranks below the average player.
Also, contrary to popular misconceptions, Sona was the WORST "healer/shielder" (just doesn't have a heal or shield, they're both garbage-tier for numerous different reasons,) the WORST mitigater that you could've built Censor on. Yes, for the exact same reasons that her "heals/shields" are garbage-tier.
Sona is genuinely the weakest character in this game and has been, every day since patch 4.13 went Live. Idgaf about your OPINIONS, because every Challenger Sona has publicly confirmed that 4.13 made her unplayable. Because Sona AS A MATTER OF FACT was LCS tier BEFORE 4.13 was FORCED onto Live in DIRECT OPPOSITION to customers' desires and she hasn't had a single legitimate pro game since. Not one. Because she is both mathematically and practically unplayable and countless professional and high-ranking players have publicly stated as such. NOTHING HAS CHANGED. She will NEVER be playable without a FULL revert or Sion-scale rework.
I singlehandedly climbed from low silver to gold 3 playing Sona. Is she easy or is she a shit champ?
You're lvl 21 and I see absolutely no match history for you in op.gg....have you...played the game..? Or do you just watch pro streamers and regurgitate what they say on the boards?
She's not the best champ but she's far from unplayable. Why would pro players pick her when there are better alternatives for pro play at the moment? Pro play only accounts for 1%, actually even less than that, of the playerbase for this game. Just because a pro streamer doesn't play a champ or chooses not to play a champ doesn't mean the champ is unplayable. There are absolutely 0 unplayable champs in this game, every single one is playable, there are just some champs that are stronger in the current meta. Sona has some easily exploitable weaknesses however she is still viable botlane.
Once again, I'm gonna ask...lvl 21...no match history, can't see any champs you've played........have you actually..........played the game? You have absolutely 0 ranked history, doesn't look like you've ever touched it or even played the champ you're complaining about. Right now the game is very high in damage overall. Sona was more viable when teamfights lasted longer and people weren't blown up in 5 seconds, however, that is not to say she is unplayable. She can be a more risky pick but she's still able to function.
Maybe she's not as viable as she could be but like....she carried me an entire tier to gold 3 and got me some sparkly rewards so she's gotta be good for something?