Did Gnar Lowered Diversity in Top lane?

Narog·3/18/2015, 11:25:22 PM·3 votes·418 views

Gnar Is way better than many of the Top laners we used to see , hes Early laning is much safer and hes late game has much more impact than

Gnar has Mobility ,has range and a Ranged attack with slow , has a % damage , Constantly turn into a Mega Gnar with more HP and armor with a Ranged slow and 2 stuns , I dont see how can many of the older champions can compete with that is one of the most insane things i seen in League he literally displaces a ton of champions and am sure we gonna get Gnar in half of the LCS matches for this year .

3 Comments

Ragnar423/18/2015, 11:34:17 PM2 votes

Gnar doesn't really have as much impact as you'd think late game. If people don't know how to manage his Rage, then he's a beast, but if people do know how to get around him... then Gnar is not someone you want on your team.

Just like all Yordles, Gnar has a bullshit laning phase, and his late-game is the opposite of his laning phase.

Also: As a Singed main, I'll still play Singed into Gnar. It's not a lost lane, it's not really even a terrible lane when comparing it to some other top options. It's just a tough lane where I get my farm in the mid-game when I don't care what Gnar is building, after I've built Ninja Tabi, and Health.

Also Also: your poll assumes you're right. There's no option for "no difference in diversity" It also isn't very clear what my vote means.

disregardable3/18/2015, 11:26:22 PM1 votes

I don't even see a lot of Gnars anymore. I've literally seen more Dariuses this week than Gnar. ._. Not happy about that.