Tahm Kench

saihLfVQ34·Jan 1, 2016·8 votes·378 views

When Tahm Kench uses his Q and stuns you, it should consume his passive stacks so he has to auto you 3 times to eat you. He should not be able to Q you to stun you, then walk up and eat you.

12 Comments

BeatzBoyFTWJan 1, 20162 votes

Did you literally copyright the idea just to farm upvotes from this?

http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/TBfe1bAl-make-tahm-kench-choose

HayRossJan 1, 20162 votes

Welcome to the boards, where people do shit like this all the time and yet they somehow get upvoted

RalanrJan 1, 20161 votes

Have an Upvote for pointing out the obvious.

Another practice on these boards.

JbelsJan 1, 20161 votes

Why? Those are literally his only ways to remain a relevant threat. If you don't like getting stunned and then eaten, maybe stop getting hit by his Q? If hes doing this to you as a tank, congrats. He's wasting his ability to save his ADC to do damage to you

saihLfVQ34Jan 1, 20163 votes

Really? He should be able to walk at you because of how damn tanky he is. Also, he should be more of a support, not damage. My point is he shouldn't be able to stun you and eat you, because its redic when you are playing a tank and 32% of your max health goes away.

JbelsJan 1, 20161 votes

{quoted}

Really? He should be able to walk at you because of how damn tanky he is. Also, he should be more of a support, not damage. My point is he shouldn't be able to stun you and eat you, because its redic when you are playing a tank and 32% of your max health goes away.

What, does his target not also have the ability to walk? For every way Tahm Kench has to get to somebody, they have just as many, if not more to get away from him

Nanuk PihoqahiakJan 1, 20164 votes

This argument is ridiculous. You're acting like if you played a game against Tahm, you'd be able to just walk away from him, which implies you'd dodge every single Q.

"Oh yeah. You can just walk away from Tahm because you dodged 100 percent of his Q's." Get out of here.

JbelsJan 1, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Nanuk Pihoqahiak,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=hQONxWA9,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2016-01-01T04:35:29.856+0000)

This argument is ridiculous. You're acting like if you played a game against Tahm, you'd be able to just walk away from him, which implies you'd dodge every single Q.

"Oh yeah. You can just walk away from Tahm because you dodged 100 percent of his Q's." Get out of here.

Get off the bandwagon. Tahm has a normal winrate, and the longer the circlejerk perpetuates this stupid stereotype that Tahm Kench is broken, the longer none of you will be taken seriously

saihLfVQ34Jan 1, 20161 votes

Winrates dont mean everything. Lee Sin has a 48% win rate, yet hes one of the best jungle champs there is.

Sir YamazukiJan 1, 20162 votes

{quoted}

Get off the bandwagon. Tahm has a normal winrate, and the longer the circlejerk perpetuates this stupid stereotype that Tahm Kench is broken, the longer none of you will be taken seriously

He has an almost 61% winrate as a top laner when played by someone experienced with an average of 52.57%, that's not "normal".

JbelsJan 1, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Lord Yamazuki,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=hQONxWA9,comment-id=000000000000000000000001,timestamp=2016-01-01T05:23:27.961+0000)

He has an almost 61% winrate as a top laner when played by someone experienced with an average of 52.57%, that's not "normal".

52.57% isn't normal? Because Riot must think it's pretty damn normal if they are adamant about not nerfing him (because they know he isn't broken)

Sir YamazukiJan 1, 20162 votes

{quoted}

52.57% isn't normal? Because Riot must think it's pretty damn normal if they are adamant about not nerfing him (because they know he isn't broken)

Yes, lets completely ignore the first half of my post just because it disproves your statement.