People in bronze through gold pretend dyna q is a problem

DrDiaga·6/15/2016, 11:44:02 PM·2 votes·1,154 views

They use it as an excuse.

Like all if the sudden these three people got on a team and now they are far more skilled then bronze players anymore.

Bullshit. In high elos where there is a significantly smaller population of significantly better players it is an issue, but you can't really expect anyone to believe those three bronze guys being in a team is why you lost. They are still bronze as you are and have a high chance of remaining so.

Being on a team doesn't change the mistakes that kept them in low elo. Its a copout as to why your in bronze.

"Must be premade so op"

5 Comments

Goosetard6/15/2016, 11:46:26 PM1 votes

The issue of premades being better than non-premades isn't why dynamic queue erodes competitive integrity... it's that you can pick your teammates for all your games and if you have more friends you have access to better teammates, which isn't fair or what the ranked ladder is supposed to measure.

EndlessSorcerer6/15/2016, 11:49:36 PM1 votes

Dynamic queue is still an issue at those ranks.

It isn't why those players are still in low ELO, but it is still a problem.

My main issue with Dynamic Queue (as a Platinum player, if it matters) is the skill disparity in a game.

Last season, most players within a game would be within about three divisions of one another. This season, it is not uncommon to see people with 7+ divisions between them in the same game.

Zarkkast6/15/2016, 11:55:53 PM1 votes

It is a problem accross all elos, just a lot more problematic as you move up the ladder.

If 5 challengers are in Skype they'll have an advantage of say 100% (just a figurative number to exemplify the argument) against 5 challengers which aren't skyped.

If 5 bronzes are in Skype they'll have an advantage of 20%, they will still make mechanical errors and stupid decisions, but you gotta remember that the enemy bronze team will also make all these mistakes and being able to communicate grant them an overall advantage.

LegitBusinessman6/16/2016, 12:10:37 AM1 votes

I have to agree with this comment. I notice absolutely no difference in ranked que. In my games from B3 to G5 I NEVER ONCE said "Those guys were clearly a premade and that's why we lost.'