Which would you rather have?

In a post by a RIOT they plan on expanding the free champ ration to include more champs.

I find this perfectly fine. They also commented as they increase the champion pool from 137 to 145 so would the amount of free champs in the rotation.

I found the fact they plan on expanding to 145 champs and chances are most likely more from that point just a little bothersome. THIS IS MY OPINION: but I commented that instead of having 145 champs and keep creating new champs that we need to make the 70 or so champs that arent viable or playable more viable and playable instead of introducing more champs.

To me it would seem harder to get all the older champs and nonviable champs in align with the current state of the game and the other purposed changes up to snuff if they are working on so many more new champs. Sometimes more is less and less is more.

If we(RIOT) just fix the champs that need work and update them via reworks, tweaks, whatever may have you then we effectively increased the champion pool to be picked and played and therefore increasing diversity among the champs. This would also help with the over balancing of the game. I just dont see how they could manage to do this while adding new champs and then the new rune system with out having massive issues with balance.

So basically would you rather have more champs and new champs or fix and update the other champs that have issues?