Common champion class misconceptions made by the League community...

So I decided to make this thread because I noticed that some streamers and other people in League in general (not going to name who specifically) say some things about tanks in this case that aren't true. So here goes...

People assume that tanks are suppose to deal 0 damage and be able to do what the name itself suggests, tank damage. People of league must realise that not every tank is supposed to be the same, not every tank is strong in the same way. Some tanks can tank damage better than others, other tanks can deal more damage than others but lack in being able to tank as much damage as others mentioned above. Believe it or not but Riot does try to make every champion in league diverse in some way.

.

People that play assassin's assume that just because they are playing an assassin that they should be able to delete any squishies no matter what, to the point that makes it soundd as if that there shouldn't be any other alternative. Which I can understand in some ways but some champions are designed to have such thing prevent from happening and this is where the word strategy comes in. Where assassin's would have to as others say "bait" them to using that one thing that prevents assassin's from killing them.

.

People seem to dislike the role of Support in general. They complained that they have too many "shields/heals" but when that got nerfed people started complaining about the damage that supports do. This itself brings back to the point I mentioned earlier about not all champions having to deal 0 damage, every champion in League does and has to deal some form of damage. While it might be true that some support champions deal more damage than expected they weren't originally designed to be placed in that role, but it was actually by us, players who decided to play those champions in those roles that made it work and what make it so strong and viable.