4 People Decide To Vote Yes On The Early Surrender Vote...

PrismalDawn·6/3/2019, 7:43:04 AM·1 votes·1,167 views

It doesn't matter because the ONE person who voted "No" is the 0-10 top laner with 20 CS who fed a Riven.

Why implement a favorable option in game only to mitigate its intent by making it unanimous.

6 Comments

Woodakoodashooda6/3/2019, 8:26:01 AM8 votes

It is working as intended.

The only change it needs is to have only one early surrender vote available per game per team and have the normal surrender vote timer separate so that even if 4 vote yes and one votes no at 19:59 in, a normal vote can be cast at 20:00 in.

Aliquid6/3/2019, 8:23:21 AM2 votes

Some men just like to watch the world burn..

I also tend to say no to early surrender unless we have an open inhib with the score being <10 to >25. Some comps are really strong early, mid and late. However, the same can be true with team fights. Some comps have a tendency to outperform just "RAW POWER TOP TIER PERFORMANCE" level of champs. In your example it is riven. Riven is shot down via heavy CC. Using this you guys should be picking something similar to a thresh/blitzcrank support or having high peels supports such as janna/lulu.

Assuming it is the game from your op.gg where you played jax, the darius into riven was an unfavorable trade in this instance. If the darius was helped by you or camped to oblivion i'd be focusing bot lane to support pressure there forcing the jungler to choose topside or botside. If he choosing bot side, let darius counter engage on the riven (as we all know riven is a hyper aggressive-turret dive loving champion) then you just have to Q E into her while she's either under turret or darius is wailing on her. Just suggestions i'd make.

Tahminatrix 6/3/2019, 5:33:51 PM1 votes

I just don't like the way its worded.

A 4/0 vote IS in fact unanimous. (happens when the 5th person doesn't vote but then the game says you need an unanimous vote to surrender)

Should just say need 5 votes.

Dorans Pants6/3/2019, 7:17:50 PM1 votes

It´s so you can be an ass and waste everyone´s time without having to face the consequences of your actions.

Pika Fox6/3/2019, 7:20:37 PM1 votes

Early surrender vote must be unanimous vote of everyone in game. Ideally theyd just remove surrenders altogether and ban people who open mid.

You queued for the game, you play the game. Plain, sweet, simple.

Xurreal6/3/2019, 8:32:09 PM1 votes

Even as the Nexus goes down. Never let them have an inch. Make them earn every moment as hard as they could possibly have to every time.