ranked surrender: unanimous only?

GoldenMean·10/2/2015, 12:11:53 AM·2 votes·565 views

Is there some merit to allowing a 4:1 surrender vote to pass in a ranked game? I'd appreciate it if I couldn't lose by surrender. I think the 4:1 surrender vote is fine in norms, though. Just for ranked it should be unanimous.

2 Comments

Bastard Chief10/2/2015, 12:42:06 AM3 votes

You're a loser Golden more so than the people voting to surrender. You're a loser because you rather waste someones life and time when they could go onto the next match. (Sorry not everyone probably has 12 hours like you do to play this game). It's smart to surrender when you know it's a lost cause.

Sorry, I don't want shitty champion XP, IP, and everything else. So going a full 40 minutes getting destroyed to get such bad rewards is a slap in a face.

If you ask me, they need to fix the surrendering because the 3 to 2 that voted yes should automatically end the game by surrender but it's not. it takes 4 to 1 in most cases unless someone got disconnected, then 3 to 1 and so on.

HopFrogger10/2/2015, 12:15:18 AM2 votes

Disagree. One person is allowed to dissent, but shouldn't be able to influence the outcome.