There is no such thing as change for the sake of change
Change either evolves something or devolves it. This is my thesis and I will use the past 4 years of LoL as evidence.
Change either evolves something or devolves it. This is my thesis and I will use the past 4 years of LoL as evidence.
Both statements can be true. Whether or not something d/evolves has no bearing on the rationale behind the impetus.
But change for the sake of change still sucks. Silicon Valley, for years now, has been pursuing disruption for the sake of disruption.
"Change for the sake of change" refers to the motive, not to the outcome.
Whether or not it (d)evolves something is independent of the reason it is done.