Early Surrender

PrismalDawn·Jun 21, 2017·2 votes·346 views

Much like a 10 ban system to an ever-changing game, Riot promised us a new option to benefit the players, but like always, it came with a very determinant catch.

Why the fuck does an early surrender have to be unanimous?! You have any idea what it's like to play solo queue? The ONE person always voting no is MORE THAN LIKELY the one to be trolling and/or feeding their ass off. Wtf, if 4 people agree they don't want to play the game anymore, END THE FUCKING GAME

...that is all. Excuse the French.

2 Comments

Junglerz FaultJun 21, 20172 votes

They should just get rid of early surrender all together, along with this early game meta. I miss the long games.

DragfinJun 21, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Much like a 10 ban system to an ever-changing game, Riot promised us a new option to benefit the players, but like always, it came with a very determinant catch.

Why the fuck does an early surrender have to be unanimous?! You have any idea what it's like to play solo queue? The ONE person always voting no is MORE THAN LIKELY the one to be trolling and/or feeding their ass off. Wtf, if 4 people agree they don't want to play the game anymore, END THE FUCKING GAME

...that is all. Excuse the French.

And the 4 players who are surrendering 9 out of 10 times are bad players who wish to go ruin another game sooner rather than later instead of actually getting better to the point where surrendering is an after though. They need to remove it altogether at low elo because it is abused by bad players. Why not look in the mirror and think about why you feel the need to FF all the time rather than that one player actually trying to learn and get better? You are not innocent of tilting people with shitty play.