a complaint of the intro to patch notes 6.4...

"For example, if our goal was 'make X champion stronger and healthier' but the character became stronger and more frustrating, we'd prefer to solve the newly-created frustration than simply reverting everything."

As of now, all "solutions" to the state of "OP" champions impacted by controversial changes have all been mistakes, according to the boards community. Why would choosing to solve the champiion's current state be better than simply reverting their changes. It would honestly be more simple if you were to just simply _ revert the changes_.