Some thoughts on the balance between mages and assassins during laning phase

I wanted to share a thought about laning phase and "fun", from a support player's perspective, and present an idea to the forum.

Let's suppose bottom lane is constantly getting ganked. this means that aside from my own lane's dynamics, I am either responding to a gank initiated by my allies - mid or jungle - or defending my lane from a gank. Both of those actions are initiated not by me or my direct opponent, but by the other roles on our team.

On the other hand if I gank mid lane, I sometimes tag along with the jungler - which is a major investment of time - or i go myself. In both cases I am heavily invested in making the action happen.

This means that my agency on the game is greater when I gank other lanes, than when my own lane is getting ganked. When I say agency i do not mean how much impact I have over the end result, but rather how much of the decisions that led up to the result I was making as opposed to responding to.

From a game agency perspective, it is then better FOR ME that I am able to gank mid lane and enemy jungle. That enemy mid lane and jungle don't have absurd mobility to easy-mode escape any gank attempt and UN-conditional damage with which they can easy mode take me out if I gank them.

[I do not mean better for the game as a whole. I mean for greedily for me as a support player]

On the other hand the more mobility, outplay potential and un-conditional burst the mid lane and jungle have, me as the support player experience a decrease in player agency, during the laning phase - agency that goes to the mid and jungler of both teams.

From that, my interest as a support player IN THE EARLY GAME is that mid lane is populated by relatively less mobile champions than mine who can't just kill me if i get in range (hi annie). I.E. my selfish interest is that mid range and maybe also long range mages can not only survive but win in lane against assassins.

thoughts?