[{quoted}](name=About 25 Snakes,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RsemsmWr,comment-id=000100010001,timestamp=2018-12-02T22:08:16.023+0000)
I love breaking the meta as much as the next guy but the whole point is we have pretty few champions who are AP but actually intended for the jungle, unlike what you've posted which is mostly a collection of mids and supports. 5 out of those characters are actual, intended junglers. Only two of them are remotely meta (Eve, Nid). If don't see a problem with that picture then I don't know what to tell you lol.
In other news, pretty sad that Neeko isn't a dedicated jungler. Was totally under the impression we'd be getting a new jungler this time around since we've already had a new champ of each other role. See you all in 5 months I guess.
My question is: Why do you care if a champ is a dedicated role? Often the hardest counters to dedicated role meta champs ARE global utility champs, which in fact makes them some of the most meta champs by inversion.
For example, Zyra literally counters about 90% of the meta AND dedicated role roster for jungle. If a Xin Zhao gets a Zyra in the jungle as an opponent, he's almost locked into a loss. She also fairly locks the following dedicated junglers:

It's actually in fact true that... Support champs are the core champions designed to counter junglers. Mid, Adc, and most top lane dedicated champions are generally designed to be a Jungler's easy targets. Supports are designed to get in the way of that. So what happens when you give a support a gold income, better levels? They begin to outstrip their "designed for" capacities, making many of them the most meta junglers in the game......
Just because something isn't played much doesn't mean it's not meta. It sometimes means that people are scared to tilt their teams through stereotypical bias, and lack of understanding. It sometimes means people don't want to think, and take for granted norms and calculate the actual roles a champion is best for. They just want to .... accept.