One for one is NOT "worth"

waspcreaturesx·1/29/2016, 4:16:49 AM·4 votes·693 views

Can we PLEASE teach players that you should not be trying to 1v3 (or 1v4 or 1v5) to try to get a pick on the other team.

Almost whole team last game would individually go in against the other team and die trying to kill one of them that was low health. Point blank, even if you killed ONE of them and die you gave one kill and at least 3 assists for the one kill you got.

Point is, you're feeding the whole enemy team.

8 Comments

Dediguise1/29/2016, 4:21:31 AM1 votes

That depends on how much gold the other person is worth vs how much you are worth as well as what your teams do after the death.

Generally though you are correct.

Mayor Stubbs1/29/2016, 4:22:29 AM1 votes

I mean, it's debatable depending on the circumstances of the game and which allied champ killed which enemy champ.

But for the most part I do agree most players shouldnt typically try to do that

The Poetic Zed1/29/2016, 4:23:41 AM1 votes

In most scenarios yeah. But if it's mid/early game, and your jungler is around to take the turret after the 1 for 1, then that's definitely worth. Going 1 for 1 for a shutdown is also worth it. Killing the enemy adc late game in a 1 for 1 is worth if you're an assassin.

Steel Blossom1/29/2016, 4:51:10 AM1 votes

Money-wise you are certainly right. However, strategically, an assassin going one for one with the enemy ADC late game is good enough already.

stealthfox941/29/2016, 4:51:20 AM1 votes

"WORTH" Smh

Trídent1/29/2016, 4:56:36 AM1 votes

unless 1/42342342/424521124321412 person kills a 14213423234/1/432423432 person

which is obviously unrealistic