I honor the most toxic person in the game for being fun to play with.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØD·Jul 9, 2017·5 votes·1,073 views

Downvote me all you want. I believe honor shouldn't be earned and everyone deserves equal treatment no matter what because honor is a false sense of entitlement in itself. Nobody should be rewarded for doing good or right or doing what they are supposed to do, like being civil and respectful. Half of the people don't deserve to be honored anyway. I don't need your wolf in sheep's clothing attitude for Honor and keys. I like a person who isn't scared to be themselves, even if it's socially unacceptable.

My honor even comes with a bonus gift of a very detailed and articulate in-depth report on your gameplay and behavior. See you on the rift.

36 Comments

Mecha MaIphiteJul 9, 20174 votes

wow, ur so cool and edgy xd

RenownedWheat42Jul 9, 20174 votes

Hooooooly shit this is the edgiest thing I'll read all day.

Zone of EndlessJul 9, 20173 votes

{quoted}

Hooooooly shit this is the edgiest thing I'll read all day.

found the kayn main :^)

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

found the kayn main :^)

Aren't we all kayn main's at heart? Isn't the whole premise of the new champ the battle of self? The duality of man? The identity crisis within us all to choose between eliminating people that are just like us, or people that are not? Or do we just eliminate everyone period.

SEKAIJul 9, 20174 votes

[{quoted}](name=ÂFRÏCÂN KÂSSÂDÏN,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PzO9eOEG,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-07-09T18:51:13.658+0000)

[...]I don't need your wolf in sheep's clothing attitude for Honor and keys. I like a person who isn't scared to be themselves, even if it's socially unacceptable.[...]

So it's only valid "to be yourself" and approved by you when it's antisocial and toxic? What about those who are just naturally good, kind and all that, where's their honours according to your stance of "being themselves"? Because they sure as well ain't getting any from you. Why?

What about murderers, abusers, bullies and whatever criminals etc who do their things because they like to, should they be celebrated for "isn't scared to be themselves, even if it's socially unacceptable"? Because if you support those kind of thinking in that context, then I'm sorry, you might be a sociopath.

You also said

Nobody should be rewarded for doing good or right or doing what they are supposed to do, like being civil and respectful.

So why are people doing their worst deserving of honours then, when people doing good like "what they are supposed to do" in your opinion are not worthy for it?

Don't you think your logic is a bit flawed, even according to your own line of thinking? Like, it literally makes no sense in nobodys's logic, not even yours.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

So it's only valid "to be yourself" and approved by you when it's antisocial and toxic? What about those who are just naturally good, kind and all that, where's their honours according to your stance of "being themselves"? Because they sure as well ain't getting any from you. Why?

What about murderers, abusers, bullies and whatever criminals etc who do their things because they like to, should they be celebrated for "isn't scared to be themselves, even if it's socially unacceptable"? Because if you support those kind of thinking, then I'm sorry, you might be a sociopath.

You also said

So why are people doing their worst deserving of honours then, when people doing good like "what they are supposed to do" in your opinion are not worthy for it?

Don't you think your logic is a bit flawed, even according to your own line of thinking? Like, it literally makes no sense in nobodys's logic, not even yours.

I love it when people like you attempt to compare simple scenarios with outlandish and outrageous scenarios such as murder and rape. It tickles me at how you think any of that matters here. Like, it literally makes no sense in nobodys's logic, not even yours. And trust me, criminals are celebrated, just look at America's government.

SEKAIJul 9, 20172 votes

[{quoted}](name=ÂFRÏCÂN KÂSSÂDÏN,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PzO9eOEG,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2017-07-09T20:45:50.422+0000)

I love it when people like you attempt to compare simple scenarios with outlandish and outrageous scenarios such as murder and rape. It tickles me at how you think any of that matters here. Like, it literally makes no sense in nobodys's logic, not even yours.

I also included "simple" cases of abusers and bullies. You didn't address those.

You also didn't address any of the other legitimate concerns I've raised to your justification. Such as why you only approve someone "being themselves" when they're toxic (as you claim to only give honours to those who stay true to themselves), but don't acknowledge it whatsoever when someone is just naturally good.

You also quoted my last line completely out of context, and without addressing that I raised there too. I addressed where you said being "good" is expected and thus not deserving of honours, but then goes on giving honours to those misbehaving (ie, they're performing less than what's expected of people in your view. So why do they deserve honour in your logic again?).

Again, your justification as far as I could tell, makes 0 sense.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

I also included "simple" cases of abusers and bullies. You didn't address those.

You also didn't address any of the other legitimate concerns I've raised to your justification. Such as why you only approve someone "being themselves" when they're toxic (as you claim to only give honours to those who stay true to themselves), but don't acknowledge it whatsoever when someone is just naturally good.

You also quoted my last line completely out of context, and without addressing that I raised there too. I addressed where you said being "good" is expected and thus not deserving of honours, but then goes on giving honours to those misbehaving (ie, they're performing less than what's expected of people in your view. So why do they deserve honour in your logic again?).

Again, your justification as far as I could tell, makes 0 sense.

Well you see the thing is, I'm not the one having trouble comprehending the post. It's not my job to hold your hand when you dont understand something somebody does that you don't agree with. As for what makes sense to you, that is not my concern at all. There's honor in being dishonorable, you are just blind to its realities.

SEKAIJul 9, 20172 votes

[{quoted}](name=ÂFRÏCÂN KÂSSÂDÏN,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PzO9eOEG,comment-id=0005000000000000,timestamp=2017-07-09T20:57:29.297+0000)

Well you see the thing is, I'm not the one having trouble comprehending the post. It's not my job to hold your hand when you dont understand something somebody does that you don't agree with. As far as what makes sense to you, that is not my concern at all.

The point of communication, ie writing and speaking and all, is to exchange information between our brains, as that's the only way for 1 person to know what another is thinking. To that end, the information shared has to "make sense" by following certain protocols and ground-rules otherwise nobody knows what the actual fuck you're talking about. Such as if your reasoning is self-contradictory, the ideas do not connect at all, or whatever problem have you.

Whether or not your reasoning is "socially acceptable" is 1 matter, and whether or not I agree with it is not even a question at hand, the problem is that your post/reasoning here isn't even consistent with itself to begin with. Your post is self-contradictory. Nobody can make sense out of something that inherently doesn't make sense with itself. So either your comprehension is so fucked up you have no issues "understanding" it, or that your expression capability is so bad you speak of things that go against each other without realising.

Either way: You shared this piece of information. It is YOUR job to make it understandable by others, and it shall be YOUR concern whether or not people actually get what you're talking about. Otherwise, why even bother sharing on a public forum if all you want is a confined echo chamber?

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

The point of communication, ie writing and speaking and all, is to exchange information between our brains, as that's the only way for 1 person to know what another is thinking. To that end, the information shared has to "make sense" by following certain protocols and ground-rules otherwise nobody knows what the actual fuck you're talking about. Such as if your reasoning is self-contradictory, the ideas do not connect at all, or whatever problem have you.

Whether or not your reasoning is "socially acceptable" is 1 matter, and whether or not I agree with it is not even a question at hand, the problem is that your post/reasoning here isn't even consistent with itself to begin with. Your post is self-contradictory. Nobody can make sense out of something that inherently doesn't make sense with itself. So either your comprehension is so fucked up you have no issues "understanding" it, or that your expression capability is so bad you speak of things that go against each other without realising.

Either way: You shared this piece of information. It is YOUR job to make it understandable by others, and it shall be YOUR concern whether or not people actually get what you're talking about. Otherwise, why even bother sharing on a public forum if all you want is a confined echo chamber?

It is YOUR job to make it understandable by others

It is YOUR job

YOUR job

job

How much am I getting paid?

SEKAIJul 9, 20172 votes

[{quoted}](name=ÂFRÏCÂN KÂSSÂDÏN,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PzO9eOEG,comment-id=000500000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-07-09T21:17:23.357+0000)

It is YOUR job to make it understandable by others

It is YOUR job

YOUR job

job

How much am I getting paid?

lol this is possibly one of the worst nitpicks of the century.

If you truly don't know.

"Job" is extremely often used as a casual synonyms for "duty", "task", "responsibility" etc etc.

Anyways, it would seem we're done here.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

lol this is possibly one of the worst nitpicks of the century.

If you truly don't know.

"Job" is extremely often used as a casual synonyms for "duty", "task", "responsibility" etc etc.

Anyways, it would seem we're done here.

The fact that you even started should concern you. It is your JOB to understand what you can't comprehend. I leave you to the task, I have my doubts, but I'm sure one day you will mentally blossom into the fluid superior being you were meant to be.

SanctimoniousJul 9, 20172 votes

I honor the feeder/person who god carried tiltless as a bm tactic.

Blade of JusticJul 9, 20172 votes

While I don't agree with you, at the end of the day, it's your honor to give. Nobody's gonna change that.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

And a good day to you too, sir or madam.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

I believe an honerable person is honorable before receiving honor rewards; thus being honerable is the reward in itself. We should be honoring those who don't stick to the norms and brave the treacherous waters of rule breaking. Positive deviance being a good example.

Without toxic players, there would be nothing to compare civil behavior to. We need toxicity to balance the scales of life. This is the way the honor gods intended it to be.

Cup of CocoaJul 9, 20171 votes

I'm not sure if this is sarcasm or meant to be a joke but

If you're going to report them, why honor them? Assuming your report is legit, they'll go down a level or even become dishonorable. Might as well honor someone else who will actually have a better shot at increasing their level, even if it's just because of their gameplay.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

[{quoted}](name=Silverr Rose,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PzO9eOEG,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2017-07-09T19:33:04.288+0000)

I'm not sure if this is sarcasm or meant to be a joke but

If you're going to report them, why honor them? Assuming your report is legit, they'll go down a level or even become dishonorable. Might as well honor someone else who will actually have better shot at increasing their level, even if it's just because of their gameplay.

That is what the elitist groups of honor whores want you to believe. I myself am a free-thinker who dishes out my honor at my own disposal. Free and thoughtless dispersion of goods to all on an equal level. I will not be a slave to a system that is biased to those who are already being rewarded. Again, the reward in being honorable is being honorable itself. You can't be honorable without honor. Dishonorable players deserve honor also. There is no honor among thieves. Are you a thief? If not, then don't _steal _ the chance away from those unique toxic players, who in-part are the reason the honor system is even here in the first place, to earn the same rewards as the next player.

Ben SwoIoJul 9, 20171 votes

You're either trolling, or you are thinking waaaayyy too deep into this. It's not that serious. Team mate get beat up in lane with multiple ganks but remained cool and still helped with a victory? Give 'em an honor. Team mate making good calls for everyone on objectives? Give 'em an honor. Genuinely had a god experience playing with someone on your team? Give 'em an honor. Don't agree with the honor system for whatever crazy reason you might have? SKIP IT. I know it sounds nuts, but there is an option to not honor anyone at all. Try it sometime.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

You're either trolling, or you are thinking waaaayyy too deep into this. It's not that serious. Team mate get beat up in lane with multiple ganks but remained cool and still helped with a victory? Give 'em an honor. Team mate making good calls for everyone on objectives? Give 'em an honor. Genuinely had a god experience playing with someone on your team? Give 'em an honor. Don't agree with the honor system for whatever crazy reason you might have? SKIP IT. I know it sounds nuts, but there is an option to not honor anyone at all. Try it sometime.

Why wouldn't I participate in something that benefits me? It literally doesn't matter WHO I honor. Don't like it, skip the post. I've stated what I do with my life. Your opinion on it is futile.

Ben SwoIoJul 9, 20171 votes

Yeah this whole post is attention seeking. See ya.

Doctor JarvisJul 9, 20171 votes

My honor even comes with a bonus gift of a very detailed and articulate in-depth report on your gameplay and behavior. See you on the rift.

That sounds like a report. You're reporting people. That's good.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

[{quoted}](name=Doctor Jarvis,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PzO9eOEG,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2017-07-09T21:14:37.985+0000)

That sounds like a report. You're reporting people. That's good.

I like to give them the ol' flip of the coin toss up. Imagine the kappa of getting 4 or more reports with some honor attached. It's like, here, a little remnant of your freedom to remember while your key fragment drop rate diminishes before your eyes. I like to leave them with a little hope that someone wasn't so affected by their toxicity. When you are unbothered by the trivial behavior that is toxicity, you are able to see the honor in it. It's an honor god mentality. For the religious people here, God gave them life, even if they are murderous rapists, he still wakes them up in the morning and allows them the choice of whether they want to continue their socially unacceptable behavior.

Doctor JarvisJul 9, 20171 votes

Im not even gonna touch the religious part of that.

When you are unbothered by the trivial behavior that is toxicity, you are able to see the honor in it.

Toxicity is like, the opposite of Honor (big "H"). The whole point of Honor is to reward players for not being toxic. That's why you only lose Honor for being reported.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

[{quoted}](name=Doctor Jarvis,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PzO9eOEG,comment-id=000700000000,timestamp=2017-07-09T21:36:55.006+0000)

Im not even gonna touch the religious part of that.

Toxicity is like, the opposite of Honor (big "H"). The whole point of Honor is to reward players for not being toxic. That's why you only lose Honor for being reported.

Flawed system. I guess I should start my final stage which is to "HONOR" the "TOXIC" and "REPORT" the "HONORABLE" players. That is balance. You have helped me find the one flaw in my logic. If I am going to seek for balance of honor, I should also seek for balance of reports. Also, honor is subjective and relative. It's no different than a company monopolizing the flow of goods and services which may cut out a smaller, more traditional company's access to prospering in a certain market. People may respect the big business and ignore the small business owner that can't compete. I am here to balance ethics. To a group of criminals, they are not criminals at all; just people trying to make a living that were shut out of obtaining something because of the views of the people in control. I am the Robinhood of Honor. Call me RobinHonor the honor robber.

Rand0mH3r0XJul 9, 20171 votes

Step 5 on how to get away with murder: Discredit the witness.

Your honor is dead. And now you are trying to convince the people that we are wrong? You tell us we deserve no honor, honor is not respectable, honor need not come with recognition, honor should be equal. You spout the ideas of communism. For "society." Could you imagine if "For Honor" was "For Society", that game would be fucked. You can play in the League of Society, I will play in the League of Legends.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Step 5 on how to get away with murder: Discredit the witness.

Your honor is dead. And now you are trying to convince the people that we are wrong? You tell us we deserve no honor, honor is not respectable, honor need not come with recognition, honor should be equal. You spout the ideas of communism. For "society." Could you imagine if "For Honor" was "For Society", that game would be fucked. You can play in the League of Society, I will play in the League of Legends.

I am the Legend of Society my friend. I easily pass thru both worlds, handing honor out like Oprah.

Rand0mH3r0XJul 9, 20171 votes

Societal, Equal, and plentiful. You're the flies on a field of wildebeest corpses.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Societal, Equal, and plentiful. You're the flies on a field of wildebeest corpses.

I am the soil that decomposes the dead corpses and returns that energy to its natural, organic state. A balancer of sorts.

Rand0mH3r0XJul 9, 20171 votes

Dirt is a medium. Bacteria is what does most of decomposition. Now you can cry for the little toe I hang you by.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Dirt is a medium. Bacteria is what does most of decomposition. Now you can cry for the little toe I hang you by.

I AM THE SOIL IN-WHICH THE BACTERIA THRIVES LITTLE BUDDY. WITHOUT ME AND MY ENVIRONMENT, THE BACTERIA WOULD SIMPLY DIMINISH INTO NOTHINGNESS UNTIL IT TRYHARDS, MUTATES, AND/OR ADAPTS TO MY GODLY DIRTY HABITAT.

Rand0mH3r0XJul 9, 20171 votes

Bacteria thrives in water, for water is soluble. Dry desolate dirt harbors no life else, Venus and Mars would be alive.

ÂFRÏCÂN GØDJul 9, 20171 votes