Why ezrael has 125% AD RATIO on his Q?

Idk why this post is being downvoted, you're not even complaining you're just stating/asking something.

He was weak when Ardent ADCs were strong so Riot decided to power creep him

"Muh skillshot"

cause he sucks as adc now he is op cause of him abusing things not for his ad ratio

slap dark harvest on him with ,, and anything else really and watch as he does 600 dmg with one q at level 10.

"Pure damage" is actually a thing in the game, and Ezreal doesn't do it. Fountain laser does. You were probably looking for the term "true damage", but even that isn't quite right, since doing a lot of physical damage doesn't make it true, and the same % of the damage is reduced by armour. You could get something very similar to true damage if you managed to get enough lethality/other shred effects to reduce the enemy armour to 0 (which I don't think is possible at level 1), but even then it wouldn't strictly be the same as true damage, since true damage isn't impacted by sources of damage reduction (e.g. ) while someone at 0 armour getting hit by a physical attack would still have that damage reduced.

Not that you care about the distinction and the point is really just "Nerf Ez or convince me he doesn't need it", but y'know. Fun facts.