Boards›Gameplay

Maybe a stupid idea but hear me out

xxbrad2o12xx·9/27/2015, 10:59:41 AM·1 votes·483 views

I don't know riots stance on devour and personally I don't have a stance on it either I use it sometimes and sometimes I don't and of course this is just an idea and would need balanced better.

What if devour gathered stacks like item 3027?

Like I said this would need to be balanced course so don't hate on me from throwing this out there. An example I can think of how this would be useful is it gives junglers who use devour more incentive to gank just because they will still be gaining stacks maybe on a timer that gets disabled for x amount of time when you kill a jungle monster so you cant finish devour even earlier than it already gets finished.

I personally have no issues with this item but when using the item I will say my mindset does change mainly because if I do bad I fear I will scale into a useless piece of trash and be of no use to my team lol but when it does work im not saying its overpowered but gold well spent but I do guess if you made the decision to go devour when your team is losing that is your fault and you should be punished for it.

1 Comments

Doctor Jarvis9/27/2015, 11:08:05 AM1 votes

I see what you're going for, but no. The idea of devourer is that its feast/famine. If you build devourer you're saying "TRY and shut me down" because if they don't you'll get out of control. It also says to your team "Don't let them shut me down please I promise I'll carry later" making up for the fact that you probably aren't ganking. I don't want to defend the current iteration (I don't like it myself) but it does make sense for it to work this way instead of any other I've read.