I mean I think they're interesting and new. but... tbh I'm just not excited about them all that much. they designed them so that champions can go different paths... but it really just feels like each tree is unfocused now. it feels like just a new version of something that's more or less, just made. I don't want to say slapped together, becuase it does feel like thought is put into it. but it doesn't feel like design is put into it...
xJLx MCHammer1 votesthey are trying too hard to make you feel like there are "more ways" to build you champion. Unless you are like high elo, that crap really doesn't help. For low elo (gold or lower), there will always be a min max system
lofi n chillhop1 votesI don't really understand why you say this. if there were more ways to do something, why is it limited to high elo? I'd think that high elo is more restrictive because it's more competitive. what do you mean by min max? you always should max one tree. with the way the did it new, I was kinda hoping two 1st-tier would be an option to consider, but there's really a substantial difference in strength between each tier...
xJLx MCHammer1 votes[{quoted}](name=jinxie pooksie,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=IL8ULqNX,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2015-11-04T01:40:03.168+0000)
I don't really understand why you say this. if there were more ways to do something, why is it limited to high elo? I'd think that high elo is more restrictive because it's more competitive. what do you mean by min max? you always should max one tree. with the way the did it new, I was kinda hoping two 1st-tier would be an option to consider, but there's really a substantial difference in strength between each tier...
I'm saying, for low elo players, you wont need to do a different kind of masteries pages. Most low elo players, it does not make a big difference, just like how rune pages don't make huge difference, IT's small because in low elo, it's the big decisions and small decisions that make the difference, not the 2% extra hp dmg you did.