pls disable new champions for the first few weeks so people dont int in rank with them

Pang Y·Mar 22, 2017·11 votes·860 views

just had a galio player today who ints :)

15 Comments

TheHappyReaperzMar 23, 20172 votes

Did they purposefully int, or were they just bad at the game?

zaire90Mar 23, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Did they purposefully int, or were they just bad at the game?

Was wondering the same hate when people say someone is int. and they were just bad

Pang YMar 23, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Was wondering the same hate when people say someone is int. and they were just bad

yah. goes 2/8 in lane and told him this is why you dont play champions that had just been released in ranked. Then calls me a weeb and starts inting galio

HethaleanMar 22, 20171 votes

Naw make disables account specific. You go any game negative KDA in ranked? Disabled for your account until you play 15 (or some other 5+ number) normals with it at positive KDA.

o4xVC1VHLRMar 23, 20171 votes

With ranked only having winners, eventually everyone would lose a few and there would be no one left. I hope I can see you in game and throw.

HethaleanMar 23, 20171 votes

Clearly this is hyperbole because this idea is entirely unsustainable and dumb. Much like the OP's idea. There are 1000 ways to lose LoL and trying to weed out arbitrary ones such as this (the new champ? disable in ranked) makes no sense because you'll have any number of other ways that you can focus on beyond your own gameplay to say why you lost "and how it wasn't you".

Did you forget that people play on the PBE so there are a fair number of people with ~1 week experience on the 'new' champion?

Lastly, just on a logical standpoint, you can have a positive KDA and lose, and a negative KDA and win.

Everyone thinks they have 'such a great idea' with this resolution, but it's a very poor solution in my opinion and just encourages further completely one sided Normal's games because people who never play ranked but are like Diamond tier go to Normals to play new champions with Silver to Gold MMR.

That being said I'm kind of sad that I didn't get more than -3 until now on this suggestion. It was a truly awful suggestion.

Pang YMar 23, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Clearly this is hyperbole because this idea is entirely unsustainable and dumb. Much like the OP's idea. There are 1000 ways to lose LoL and trying to weed out arbitrary ones such as this (the new champ? disable in ranked) makes no sense because you'll have any number of other ways that you can focus on beyond your own gameplay to say why you lost "and how it wasn't you".

Did you forget that people play on the PBE so there are a fair number of people with ~1 week experience on the 'new' champion?

Lastly, just on a logical standpoint, you can have a positive KDA and lose, and a negative KDA and win.

Everyone thinks they have 'such a great idea' with this resolution, but it's a very poor solution in my opinion and just encourages further completely one sided Normal's games because people who never play ranked but are like Diamond tier go to Normals to play new champions with Silver to Gold MMR.

That being said I'm kind of sad that I didn't get more than -3 until now on this suggestion. It was a truly awful suggestion.

Its unsustainable and dumb for wanting to have a 5v5 ranked game and not a 4v5? Its dumb because if they dont know how to play it and pick it in ranked, I have no right to be mad for them being so clueless on a retarded pick?

HethaleanMar 23, 20171 votes

Just reread what I said. There are 1000 ways in LoL (estimation) that would cause people with this mindset to think it is a 4v5. Learning a champion is knowing how it fits into a meta (aka how it plays with other champions, and how it plays against others). So why not disable all of ranked after a new champion/rr comes out because no one knows how to play with or against it. So everyone needs to go to Normals to learn it. There are 100+ champions and no one knows 100% of the matchups (which plays a critical factor in how well you do in lane and in game).

I've seen people rock on a champion their first time, and I've seen people with Mastery 7 feed their ass off. It's correlative and not a guarantee that experience will yield you a great game nor inexperience yield you a bad game.

So just assuming someone has no experience with a new champion is also retarded in my opinion because like I said... people play on the pbe and might have 100 games with it. You don't know.

You never know who is going to do very well or very bad in a game for what reasons. It's arbitrary to try to think you have anything resembling reason by making a ton of assumptions on people's play based on how much experience you think people'll have with it based on how long it has been out. People can get a surprising number of games in a surprisingly short period of time. I've seen people get 5 games in by noon when they wake up at 8AM.

The suggestion here is just another variation of 'proving your skill' with the champion style limitations that the post gets riddled with "Must be mastery 4 to rank" "Must have 10 games". It's all arbitrary and means nothing in the end.

As for 'what rights' you have to 'be mad', that sounds more like a job for a therapist really. If you find it ENRAGING to lose a Ranked game because of someone else that is.

Brutalitops01Mar 22, 20171 votes

I don't think it should be the first few weeks, and I also don't think it should be a pure disable. Available in normals only for the first week at the most.

Very Hard EngageMar 22, 20171 votes

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/2457219527/203807166?tab=overview

its not the champ, its the player giving time and thought before hand what they're going to do in the match.

i have 6900IP, i could literally buy kled and first time him in ranked. thats outrageously dumb and shouldn't be allowed.

but now were back to "well whats the difference between new champion and just buying an already existing one and trying it out"

but i agree with you none the less, you should have some experience on a champ before you take it to ranked and if what you suggested was done then it should also be for new purchases as well for the same exact reason.

o4xVC1VHLRMar 23, 20171 votes

So what is your proposal to stop feeders that have 500+ games on a particular champ?

Pang YMar 23, 20171 votes

If you could use your brain and see why we need this, I'd be happy :)

Pang YMar 29, 20171 votes

you act like i need a therapist when i dont. you just act like a autist who decides the need to type out several paragraphs just to prove a point. fuck outta here with that. lmfao

PvtFlowersMar 23, 2017

What makes things any different a few weeks down the road? A lotta people only play ranked. So you get people feeding tomorrow instead of today. People gotta learn the champ eventually.

Pang YMar 23, 20171 votes

{quoted}

What makes things any different a few weeks down the road? A lotta people only play ranked. So you get people feeding tomorrow instead of today. People gotta learn the champ eventually.

The whole point of doing this is to play it in normals and learn in those games. Use your brain. [slayer-jinx-unamused]