So are Garen and Shyvana tanks?
Honest question. Some pals of mine are saying their tanks but they don't have much CC or tank properties imho.
Honest question. Some pals of mine are saying their tanks but they don't have much CC or tank properties imho.
juggernauts. They don't die but they'll kill your team
no, they're fighters
they just build very tanky because they don't have a lot of mobility and their base damage is really high
Thought so.
it dont matter
Then why the carp fish did you post? Im obviously asking because it matters.
but it dont
and they arent tanks they are bruisers
this champs are listed as tanks
They are Juggernauts, which are a subclass of Fighters. They are not Tanks.
Everyone calls them tanks because you build tanky, technically there not because none of their abilites increase their tanky-ness but meh there both tanks lol
there not because none of their abilites increase their tanky-ness
u wot m8?
Garen has two defensive passives and a defensive active. Shyvana has a defensive passive and a defensive stat boost with ult.
They are not tanks because they are poor initiators due to their lack of disables.
they are tanky, good as a damage sponge, but the "real" tanks have more cc than them. shyvana also has no real tanky steroid i.e. nothing in her kit makes her more tanky except for her weak passive, well and bonus health on her ult, still not enough
if your team is squishy it's better to pick shyvana than kindred, for instance
arguing about the exact role names is a silliness, like i don't see much difference between hecarim and amumu but some people do...
No, they are both Fighters who can get Tanky.
No, they are both Fighters who can get Tanky.
not can, should
Garen was once a tank.
Now he's more of a fighter/diver with some defensive prowess.
They both live longer than half the tanks but lack hard c/c
In the most not-silly sense no they are absolutely positively not tanks.
But some people do call them tanks anyways.
The term now used for them is "juggernaut"