bans for urf
Why don't we get 6 bans per team in urf? it would make the game a lot more fun with the bullshit champs banned or just more champs banned
Why don't we get 6 bans per team in urf? it would make the game a lot more fun with the bullshit champs banned or just more champs banned
once the top 12 are banned, people will just complain about whatever the new popular picks are
once the top 12 are banned, people will just complain about whatever the new popular picks are
That's not true. There are certain champs that are extremely broken in this mode. I'm fine with the rest of them, but certain champs like Shaco, Sona, and Hecarim deserve to be banned as much as possible.
but that only consumes 1/2 of the bans.
its just getting so annoying every game is the champs, its like no one knows how to try other champs
it be cool if it was random like in aram
yeah, variety really is lacking in this mode, i just feel like increasing the number of bans would limit the pool of champs people are willing to play even more.
To this day, I've still yet to see a Sona win a game of URF. I haven't even seen one end with a positive score. I'm about 99% certain it's only low-bronze players that are complaining about her.
Eve, Nid and Morg are good bans too.
To this day, I've still yet to see a Sona win a game of URF. I haven't even seen one end with a positive score. I
Say what? http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1780825046/40109297?tab=overview
Congratz, you beat up bronze 5 players. Fact still stands that not in a single game I've personally seen of URF has there ever been a Sona that's won or gone positive.
...and I've played more URF and seen more Sonas than I'd care to.
What you have there is what is called an "outlier" in mathematics, for multiple reasons. First, it's a singular number amongst countless other numbers, being on the highest end of the spectrum. The highest and lowest numbers are often removed from equations because they are toxic anomalies that poison the results of the mean or average. Secondly, there was a Sona on both sides of that game and the opposite both A) Lost and; B) went negative, not only backing my original statement, but also thus fully neutralizing any differing outcomes of the opposing team.
"The only place Sona still works is in low elo where people don't know how to right click on a champion." ~ A Wild AP Sona
^ The #1 Sona player in the world.
Checkmate and good day to you.
I'm sorry you're just a sad Silvie cause most of them were Gold. With your attitude towards people you'll never get better. So have fun with that.
[{quoted}](name=A Wild AP Sona,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=FiME8n7M,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2014-12-16T03:13:48.349+0000)
anyone who thinks sona is OP is garbage at this game
she is underpowered as fuck and dies in 1-2 hits from any champion
just flash and hit her
~ person with 2000 games of sona experience that knows more than you all put together
You're attempting to play chess without a king.
Sorry don't see anything here... just blah blah blah. I've seen this garbage user (A Wild AP Sona) before, and could care less what they think. I never said she was OP, I just proved your whole thing wrong that she's never won in URF cause I've done it many times with highly positive stats.
Also, stats mean nothing when winning a match, so you might wanna look into that too.
And who the fuck is playing Chess here? You are sad trying to use that as an analogy.
So according to you, challenger-level players are "garbage" and you don't care what they think. I understand.
I also understand why you're still attempting to play with only pawns and no other pieces.
They are currently plat former diamond, that's not challenger.
You're still a troll using stupid analogies that have nothing to do with this..
He said "challenger-level" not challenger. Get your facts straight, he's fallen from glory because Sona is unplayable.
The only troll here is you and I pray the forum mods finally start doing their job. Although I suspect they won't and I'll have to file yet another complaint to player support...
Saying "challenger-level" implies they ARE challenger. So you need to get your own facts straight. "Fallen from glory cause she's playable"?! LOLOL make me laugh some more.
Actually no I'm not, I've given feedback on these subjects as this is an open discussion, so there's nothing wrong with replying to it and saying my opinion. So good luck with that, cause I've done nothing wrong.
Sorry but how would Riot go about fitting that many on the screen?