Sure, maybe not the first or second death, but after you start running into enemies after we ping you to not go there, or fighting enemies way ahead of you; you're intentionally feeding.
I don't care if it's intentional or not but you're feeding and you deserve a ban.
Valor Bot2 votesSome people genuinely do not understand when the right time to go in is and when it isn't. I know sometimes I do things in spite of my teammates' warnings because I really believe I can pull it off (sometimes I succeed, sometimes I don't). Let's not start banning people just for the sake of them making unwise decisions with the best of intentions please.
rtbf2216514121 votes[{quoted}](name=Valor Bot,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AJqEB6aE,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-07-05T04:42:45.011+0000)
Some people genuinely do not understand when the right time to go in is and when it isn't. I know sometimes I do things in spite of my teammates' warnings because I really believe I can pull it off (sometimes I succeed, sometimes I don't). Let's not start banning people just for the sake of them making unwise decisions with the best of intentions please.
What if I mask my feeding as not feeding?
If someone can hack and it is obvious they are hacking but denying it...
How is the concept not the same here?
Valor Bot1 votesBy 'feeding,' I assume you mean 'intentional feeding,' in which case, I'm not sure I can provide a good answer... only chat logs can truly provide proof of intentional feeding -- the griefer has to admit to it. Although, I do recall reading about someone who received a post-game survey once that asked something along the lines of, "Do you believe x player was intentionally feeding?" If this system is effective, and players respond honestly to the surveys, then there should be little to no issue punishing those who actually troll in this way.
BeatzBoyFTW2 votesI don't care if it's intentional or not but you're feeding and you deserve a ban.
And this is why downvotes exist.
