PROOF that inting sion is actually trolling, despite riots braindead response to it
Hahahahah we won 4v5 vs inting sion, nah u inting sion players are trolling, idc what minimum wage riot maple says.
EZ
Hahahahah we won 4v5 vs inting sion, nah u inting sion players are trolling, idc what minimum wage riot maple says.
EZ
Proof that inting sion doesn't work when combined with inting cait, inting karma, and inting nida. Flawed theory crafting on their part.
Congrats, you won a game weighted against you vs a strat thats already proven to work in a 1 in a million case game
I always love when people say PROOF and then show just one game they recently played.
Apart from the fact that that match must have been HEAVILY under your mmr.
What does his salary have to do with this?
Also, I saw someone get run over by a car and live. Must not be a fatal thing like people warn you.
You DID have a one trick Tahm on ur team tho...
Even if you have a good strat, you can still lose. He messed up by building randuins.
See, inting Sion needs to farm a LOT in order to work. He's not INTENTIONALLY FEEDING, but rather INITIATING towers, and because of his passive focused only on towers.
Why does this work? Because Demolish scales with hp, and I'm pretty sure Sion's kit does, too. So what you do is build HP damage items, take a rune page to emphasize hp(Sions case GotU), and chunk towers down. You still have to wait for minions to come in tower range, than go ham on the tower. If enemies come, SION DOESNT FIGHT, he only hits tower pretty much so when he dies and revives with his passive he keeps hitting it, gets tower gold, dies, buys more hp+damage items, tops back into lane and ints the next tower in the same fashion.
I don't think this should be allowed either, but one game is never "proof" of anything...
So what you're saying is that because the strategy doesn't work in a Gold 5 game, it must be considered trolling?