@Meddler I know its 5-24 hrs Late... but;

CinnaBon Kittenz·Aug 19, 2016·1 votes·468 views

If you want 10 Bans, just make there 2 banning phases. Each team takes a turn banning 1 champion each and locks it in. Then the second phase comes and repeats. BAM! 10 bans with 2 less turns being spent on champion banning! :D Also if need be create Tabs within the champion pool displayed when choosing a champion or more specifically when banning. (You could edit this from the Item Sets page ;) ) And that way all your priority bans and role specific champions go where they need to! :D*[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]*

11 Comments

SquishieAug 19, 20161 votes

And BAM! the 10 mins champ select got dodged after the 15 mins Q.

Pierce The VealAug 19, 20161 votes

{quoted}

And BAM! the 10 mins champ select got dodged after the 15 mins Q.

If you read what he said, you would realize the champ select would become shorter.

Having each team pick their bans simultaneously (so both p1 ban, then p2s ban, etc.) would actually shorter the banning phase AND give 10 bans.

SquishieAug 19, 20161 votes

I didin't understand him well, but it's still a bad idea because not everyone's champion pool is as large as you think.

WolfChasesAug 19, 20161 votes

Well if they ban Rengar, Khazix, Nocturne, Pantheon, Shen, Elise and Shaco I can suck balls and delete the game.

Pierce The VealAug 19, 20162 votes

{quoted}

Well if they ban Rengar, Khazix, Nocturne, Pantheon, Shen, Elise and Shaco I can suck balls and delete the game.

Odds of that happening are basically 0.

WolfChasesAug 19, 20161 votes

You know nothing DracoMTA....you know nothing.

Pierce The VealAug 19, 20161 votes

{quoted}

You know nothing DracoMTA....you know nothing.

I play only AD casters and akali.

Since season 2... I think I know a thing or two.

WolfChasesAug 19, 20162 votes

Playing since 2012 or 2013 only jungling and sometimes getting annihilated as ADC because I am trying to learn it and I suck. See? I know to jungle man, they call me Mao Carry when I play Mao Kai jungle! :D

Most special thing I did since 2012 look:

Played Elise, rappeled to enemy ADC, stared at him for a split second, switched to human form, flashed behind because it looks cool and because fuck flash, cocooned him from behind so he can't see who did it.

It was so cool man, I have no words. ^_^

Pierce The VealAug 19, 20162 votes

{quoted}

I didin't understand him well, but it's still a bad idea because not everyone's champion pool is as large as you think.

So? 4 more champions increases the chance of banning someone's champion by that much?

We had 6 bans back when we had only 50 or so champions. That's 12% of champions. 10 out of 132 is 7.6% of champions. You'd literally have to target ban someone you knew to hit all their champions, and anyone with a champion pool of 10 champions that constantly get banned (A) is fotm OP champion only player (B) has only 16 or so champions and shouldn't be playing ranked yet (C) has incredibly bad luck, and would probably not be met with the same result the next game/champ select.

Assuming all champions have equal chance of being banned, the odds of the following respective champ pools being banned are (132-n)!/(132)! where n is in between 1 and 10, and is equal to the number of champions a player can play.

In short, the average player, or in fact any player who doesn't only use OP pick/ban champions should not experience much difficulty getting the champion they want to play, and considering the bans are usually taken by the same handful of champions, the odds for most players of getting their champion pool banned out is still so rare that it's incredibly unlikely (more likely to win the lottery if you have 4 champions or more).

Lord DesertAug 19, 20161 votes

The problem is that there is no interactions with the banns, like they banned that so we should bann that. So I would suggest a system like this: Team A bans 2,then Team B 3, A 3, and lastly B 2. Everybody has 1 ban. Its shorter than the "pick" phases(1-2-2-2-2-1), but they can still interact/react to certain banns, but banns are not as important as Picks, so a 2-3-3-2 should be good and fast enough :D

CubíxAug 19, 20161 votes

I think it would work well as a 3 ban for team A and then 3 bans for team B then have the first three players choose, 1-2-2-1 system, and then have the other 2 bans for each team and then finish off select.

so I guess its (3a-3b)-[1a-2b-2a-1b]- (2a-2b)-[2a-2b] "()=ban []=select."

something like this would be nice, because we get the initial bans and then we get the bans to control team comps, example if the enemy team locks in say yasuo and alistar, and some jungler, we could then ban say malphite or maybe orianna to kind of control that wombo team, or if they have ezreal and like nidalee banning xerath or lux could control the pokey team comp.