One Ban Per Player

BuzzinTate·Jul 24, 2015·11 votes·643 views

5 total, would make for 4 more bans in a game. Everyone would get to ban the champ they dont want to face the most.

12 Comments

ShuffledPancakeJul 24, 20151 votes

less champs to play - worse games, id rather have 6 bans and play a champ i want then having 10 bans and not playing a champ i want.

Deep Terror NamiJul 24, 20151 votes

The number of champions has been regularly increasing while the number of bans has always been the same though, so the game has (by that logic) been no worse with 10 bans now than it was last December when there was 4 less champions to choose from and only 6 bans.

ShuffledPancakeJul 24, 20151 votes

[{quoted}](name=Valkyrie Witch,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=3pyed01G,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2015-07-24T11:27:23.842+0000)

The number of champions has been regularly increasing while the number of bans has always been the same though, so the game has (by that logic) been no worse with 10 bans now than it was last December when there was 4 less champions to choose from and only 6 bans.

I have no problem with any of the champs in the game atm - my opinion xD

Deep Terror NamiJul 24, 20151 votes

You can always decline to ban anything (or play Blind of course) if you're first pick :3 It will undoubtedly piss people off though, and doubly so if they lose lane lol. It is honestly just a handicap, one which I have no problem using especially since nobody bans my Nami away XD

OrmylarJul 24, 20151 votes

[{quoted}](name=Valkyrie Witch,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=3pyed01G,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2015-07-24T11:46:37.516+0000)

You can always decline to ban anything (or play Blind of course) if you're first pick :3 It will undoubtedly piss people off though, and doubly so if they lose lane lol. It is honestly just a handicap, one which I have no problem using especially since nobody bans my Nami away XD

Becareful, people may start banning Nami now if they don't like you. :P

Rito StaffJul 24, 20151 votes

I'd ban Xerath :D I find his range, spell width, damage, low cooldowns and almost never out of mana so obnoxious, I almost have aneurism when playing against him "HOW HOW!??"

He nukes you at the edge of the fog =P I think his Q is very unpredictable, but that goes for all those delayed skillshots, XD it gets into your head while they're loading D::

BuzzinTateJul 24, 20151 votes

then theres veigars passive that gives him a free chalice and his Q gets free ap and then his ult one hits you late game lmao

O Fallen ScholarJul 24, 20151 votes

No, because it leaves no counter play. 10 total bans is too much imo. Maybe total 8 but 10 nop.

BuzzinTateJul 25, 20152 votes

how is it too much? there is like 123 champs right now, are you saying banning 10 of them would make there be no counterplay?

SeenanJul 25, 20151 votes

Lol. I'd be banning Vayne every game. I'd never see that stupidly strong champ ever again and maybe I'd actually climb since the enemy team has Vayne 85% of the time rather than my team...But then again, even when I give them a good adc (I picked Jinx for a duo bot to get a trade)..They still shit the bed.

And hey, we wont rely on the captain with his amazing bans of Yi and Teemo.

ShoulderguardJul 25, 2015

I think the current ban system is just fine, the higher skilled player in your team lobby gets to make decisions who to ban based on their experience and/or judgement. In your scenario, everyone is dished out one ban, including the players that (let's be honest here) make poor choices. I agree that with such a large and increasing champion pool, more bans should be periodically added, although stick to the current system where the most skilled player gets the bans or a majority of bans and the next-highest-skilled gets one or two.