Opinion for meta at top lane and jungle

kaykalos·4/26/2015, 9:37:53 AM·3 votes·695 views

I dont like the riot tactic, because they want top and jungle to be roles for multiple classes, when mid lane was always a place for mages and bursty champions only, the bot always was a place for marksmen. The only way to agree with a meta with no specific classes at every role is to make every role accesable to every class, for example do marksmen to be exp dependent, so that we can have different duo lanes bot, or put the tower at mid at bigger distance so that i can play fighter at mid .This is unfair for some classes to have access at multiple roles, when other classes cannot.

That is why i believe the healthiest metas for lol was the metas with specific classes at every role.

As long you have specific classes for some roles i dont like to have more diversity at top and jungle

I want top to favors bruisers and jungle tanks, as other roles favor other classes or make other roles accesable for every class!

New cleaver will change the meta in this direction:

Top ( favors fighters) bot ( favors markansmen supp) Jungle ( favors tanks) mid ( favors burst ap, burst ad)

Symmetrical metas are the healthiest metas, example: chess is a balanced game, because is symmetrical

Pls riot, i like this direction

(sry for my english i suck)

7 Comments

MLDzXnRRR4/26/2015, 9:48:42 AM4 votes

And the you pick Vlad, Liss, Kennen etc top and their bruiser gets 0 farm...

BluePolarizer4/26/2015, 9:43:57 AM2 votes

I don't like symmetric metas. Game starts in pick and ban phase.