Idea for tribunal/Champion Select

Syruess Cole·11/5/2014, 10:25:34 PM·1 votes·279 views

Tired of having to see good players have to duck out to avoid dealing with jerks and trolls in champion select?

Tired of being punished for refusing to play with trolls and big jerks while they get away with it with only a slap on the wrist?

Or just tired of seeing trolls and jerks in champion select doing whatever they want not carrying about anyone?

Then keep reading cause this post is for you.

So I came up with this idea. When i had a few games where someone was just being an absolute jerk and I just got tired of seeing it. So when we were in champion select got another jerk troll and this guy instant locked his champion after knowing he lost his pick. Which I've seen a lot its annoying but o well. But then he was saying who cares if you report me i get reported almost every game and i get away with it so you could "suck it". So the idea occurred to me why not create a system where if 4/5 of the team agrees while still in the champion select to remove someone from the game and refresh the countdown so they don't have to deal with the trolls. Or the people just being total jerks right from the start cause they think they can get away with it.

IN SHORT: Implement a new system, where if 4/5 of a team vote to remove someone in champion select do to being an obvious jerk or troll. Those removed will receive negative marks same is if they'd have been reported at end of game and be forced to wait the 5 min ditch period.

RESULTS: trolls and jerks will be able to be handled before a game so the good players aren't punished to have to duck out of a game/ or ranked match. While the troll and jerks takes the punishment. It should lead to fewer trolls in game and a less aggressive environment in champion selection.

I'm sure some people might troll this system but as a whole i think it be more helpful then hurtful. Post comments below up if you like the idea or come up with your own idea to the solution and post below.

10 Comments

Jenova Synthesis11/5/2014, 10:28:48 PM1 votes

I like the idea, but I think that it would be abused a lot. I think that 4/5 people agreeing to kick someone would be less abused, and more likely to actually happen.

Syruess Cole11/6/2014, 12:17:37 AM1 votes

If you like this post don't forget to up vote it with that shiny little arrow pointing up

Syruess Cole11/6/2014, 12:40:49 AM1 votes

Comments Our encouraged so feel free to include your input

Syruess Cole11/6/2014, 2:30:30 AM1 votes

i almost forgot game etiquette wants me to mention teemo as often as possible.......soooo DIE TEEMO DIE!!!! item 3508 Teemoitem 1039 is my attempt to stab teemo :*(

AloneInTheCrowd11/6/2014, 2:39:04 AM1 votes

I dislike the idea as much as I dislike calling roles in game lobby when the team leader is banning . Person 3 picks below me calling what I want to play will not even get an answer from me let alone explaination why I picked w/e he " called " .

Your idea can be abused by premades and people that know each other .