Listening to the LCS commentators should tell you how you've ruined this game with mobility

CLus··60 votes·3,985 views

All they can seem to talk about is a champs mobility, or how they will be reliant on flash. How this ad doesn't have a dash so its less desirable. etc. Mind numbing.

36 Comments

cFlame20 votes

A somewhat likely Idea of what Riots system is:

  1. If we begin losing money because of a problem, use the specific solution built for it, that we have planned in the infinite files, for the certain problem.
  2. You are to never solve a problem if statistics show we have made profit because of the problem instead.
  3. If the player base wants a solution to that problem, do not give attention nor interact with said players.
  4. If a champion has a problem but solving that problem will bring up another problem, stall with a slutty or badass skin.
  5. If statistics show that having a reoccurring problem exist gains more money off of the paying player base, let that problem exist for as long as possible without changing it. This is my theory, based on personal experience.
Wheatloaf4 votes

If that's what you think of a gaming company, who only makes money if people decide to give them some, I'd love to hear your opinion on governments.

Auz the Ripper4 votes

Governments are the worst possible form of organization Better only than the alternative, the state of nature

Circuit Bear19 votes

It's more that the lack of mobility isn't compensated enough.

But yea, it's pretty disgusting.

Gileneas4 votes

Agreed. If mobility is so important now, then the champions that are designed without mobility need survivability or damage increases to pay off for not being so speedy. or both.

Yfrappefort13 votes

When Doublelift got caught in the jungle, playing as Jinx, in the CLG VS Coast game yesterday.

"This is the problem with those ADC without dash. If Morgana is not around to black shield, they are screwed."

So really? Lacking mobility is now a problem. Great resume of the current fucked mobility meta.

FLY Slotmachiner2 votes

Then CLG won that team fight near blue... imagine if Jinx had mobility without her passive @_@

Anrui2 votes

That teamfight in the bush where CLG crushed? That's because they were outplayed and because Doublelift positioned himself beautifully. He wasn't in the bush with everyone else when the engage happened so he was unaffected by everyone piling in and just stood in the backline destroying. Cris made a major misplay in that fight. He was Irelia and was flanking around literally looking Doublelift in the eyes while he demolished the rest of CST, with Banshee's veil up and he literally turned around and went into the clusterfuck instead.

Anrui10 votes

I think what they mean that if you are a champion that lacks mobility, you shouldn't put yourself in the position like Doublelift did and get caught out. But yeah, apparently lacking mobility is now suddenly a serious issue because if you get caught you can't press one button and escape from their whole team while screaming 'DA JUKEZZZ' at the top of your lungs.

LeeDark4 votes

The part the announcers leave out is that lacking mobility isn't actually compensated by significant strength elsewhere. Yes, Jinx is a hypercarry, but high mobility has not stopped OTHER ADCs from being hypercarries. Some immobile mages get extra range, but it always gets attached to skillshots that are easily dodged by ANY mid that does have mobility. And top lane and the jungle? If you don't have mobility, don't even bother applying for the role.

DaFinishGame1 votes

Jinx buff on next patch confirmed

  • Passive: Jing gains 100% more speed and can dash in a 600 range area launching a missle in the opposite direction dealing (+100% movement speed)(+90% tears from the enemy ) if an ally champion is not in a 50 range
Anrui9 votes

Or they talk about how Kalista can do 2k damage to the Baron with her Rend.

ƒæµ12 votes

{quoted}

Or they talk about how Kalista can do 2k damage to the Baron with her Rend.

"THE JUNGLER HAS NO CHANCE TO SMITE THIS AGAINST KALISTA" - Monte in every single Kalista baron fight on OGN

Wheatloaf3 votes

If they let the Kalista sit on top of the objective that long, chances are they didn't have control of it to begin with.

Great Ozymandius2 votes

Sure, but it ruins smite steals which are an exciting part of the game.

Joesus Christ3 votes

[{quoted}](name=Great Ozymandius,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=Q46zgJ4O,comment-id=000200010000,timestamp=2015-02-15T22:26:39.600+0000)

Sure, but it ruins smite steals which are an exciting part of the game.

it didnt ruin smite steals. Kalista using rend is the same concept as an execute ability on champs(like spider Elise's Q) or Nunu's Devour. there are ways to bypass the smite steal even before Kalista. while i personally think rend should cap on minions(or at least neutral minions), it definitely isnt a new thing.

Anrui4 votes

2k damage though. 2. K. damage.

Joesus Christ1 votes

{quoted}

2k damage though. 2. K. damage.

i know, i said that i personally think it should have a cap. :p you also have to consider that the person smiting and Kalista (generally) arent the same person(which is contrary to my previous examples). this requires those 2 players (pro or yoloqueue) to actually communicate and coordinate the smite+rend combo. whereas a Nunu or Elise can do that all on their own.

Abyssphere1 votes

{quoted}

i know, i said that i personally think it should have a cap. :p you also have to consider that the person smiting and Kalista (generally) arent the same person(which is contrary to my previous examples). this requires those 2 players (pro or yoloqueue) to actually communicate and coordinate the smite+rend combo. whereas a Nunu or Elise can do that all on their own.

Elise has a very low damage cap on Venomous Bite. She can't outdamage smite with it at any point.

SleepyLionCub4 votes

The weird thing about mobility is that most non mobile champions arent compensated. But if anyone is like "hey we should buff them to be better than mobile champions stat wise!" everyone is just like "but that would mean the mobile champion could lose a 1v1 so its not balanced.

IlyaK19861 votes

Non-mobile champions are compensated by having a damage spell in the slot that mobile champions have a mobility spell. Non-mobile ADCs (Ashe, Varus) have higher range than Vayne and Kalista. EG Kalista/Vayne are terrible for siege comps (and terrible in ARAM).

SleepyLionCub1 votes

{quoted}

Non-mobile champions are compensated by having a damage spell in the slot that mobile champions have a mobility spell. Non-mobile ADCs (Ashe, Varus) have higher range than Vayne and Kalista. EG Kalista/Vayne are terrible for siege comps (and terrible in ARAM).

lolno.

There is no champion that has a mobility spell, that is just simply a mobility spell. Leblancs dash deals damage, Tristana's jump deals damage, cait's net slows, Akali's ult deals damage. Just try to find an ability that isnt an ult, that allows champions to ONLY dash.

Joesus Christ1 votes

{quoted}

lolno.

There is no champion that has a mobility spell, that is just simply a mobility spell. Leblancs dash deals damage, Tristana's jump deals damage, cait's net slows, Akali's ult deals damage. Just try to find an ability that isnt an ult, that allows champions to ONLY dash.

lucian e? it procs his passive, but the spell doesnt actually do anything besides dash. and iirc it also doesnt say 'procs passive', it just kinda happens.. because thats what the passive does. lol

tooomine3 votes

Dudes, listening to the Riot commentators was the problem. Nothing is more frustrating than hearing a guy who is not in the lcs try to talk about the strategies, item selections, objective prioritizations, and champion prorities that players in the LCS are making. It is abysmally awful trying to listen to any single one of them talk about how they're making mistakes with full vision of the map and no investment in the outcome of the game.

TL;DR: don't listen to the commentators.

Frikgeek11 votes

Some of them are retired pros though. And seriously, most commentators in just about every sport EVER are people who study the game, not those who play it. Are you saying all sports commentators are bad because "they have no investment in the outcome"?

Retillin4 votes

I think (NA) that Riot Kobe and Riot Jatt are wonderful colour guys.

Marinaras Trench5 votes

WHAT ABOUT PHREAK!

item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078 item 3078

Auz the Ripper2 votes

Tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooons of Damage

Pryotra1 votes

I'm sorry, but I will never forget Scumbag Jatt.

Kobe's alright in my book though.

tooomine1 votes

What I am saying is that I would listen to Phil Jackson or Kobe Bryant with a different level of respect than I would Bomani Jones.

If Bomani Jones wanted to talk to me about specific strategies that a team was gonna use against another team, I'd probably laugh at him, since he's a reporter/researcher and not actually playing professional basketball. Phil Jackson, on the other hand, should speak for itself.

In this example, Jatt is Bomani Jones trying to be Phil Jackson. I like hearing about technical aspects of a game, and some of the challenges in executing them. I do NOT want to hear about how a team is misplaying a situation based on your analysis of a team's strengths and weaknesses.

SecretAgentHulk3 votes

If the shoutcasters aren't qualified to talk about the game, who is?

tooomine1 votes

The pros, man. the people who are actually in the decision making game. Dyrus would be a good candidate, for a couple of years. but after that, I'd value his opinion about as much I do Jatt's or Phreak's. which is to say, that the opinion is largely irrelevant and your meta analysis of the game is now obsolete.

LeeDark4 votes

What a load of crap. It doesn't take a good player to recognize good and bad plays. Is it your contention that someone who enjoys watching League of Legends and learned EVERYTHING they can about the sport is not worth listening to if they can't play? What if the reason they can't play is because they suffer from, say, Parkinson's?

TL;DR: Don't listen to morons on the forums.

tooomine1 votes

Recognizing a good technical play, and recognizing a good macro play are not the same thing.

Please, for the love of god, talk tech to me on stream. Explain what an insec is, and why, in that fight, it was a phenomenal execution.

Please do not, however, talk to me about how this comp plays well into strategy that you literally know nothing about. OR, at the very least, preface your presentation of analysis as an opinion. I can't stand people who don't know anything about a team's strategic motivation trying to talk about what international stars are going to do/should be doing in their macro level movements.

The Lexer1 votes

Well it's either that or the viewers dont know what is happening

NotAnADC1 votes

I think the point of the post was to emphasize the mobility creep, and not to state their dismay at the castors.

More from Esports

More by CLus