Lock voting to only threads you have commented in.
Content not archived — this post contained embedded media.
Content not archived — this post contained embedded media.
Reposting my answer from a previous thread:
The reality of this situation is either the moderation team gets a lot more comments to moderate for value, or we get a lot of non-constructive comments: "I upvoted 'cause I agree." "I down-voted 'cause this is dumb and unbalanced."
There's not really a sweet spot where the community responsibly comments enough that moderation doesn't have to intervene, and even then we'd need to find a way to retroactively remove the vote if the comment isn't sufficiently adding to the discussion. It just isn't plausible.
[{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=BsqAv1Fj,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-03-30T13:42:16.521+0000)
Reposting my answer from a previous thread:
Oh, so you were able to read the post then? Or maybe you simply guessed what I was getting at. Yeah, the idea was to encourage rational debate by limiting voting to only those who can be bothered to comment. My original idea was to lock only downvoting to those who comment, but I figured that idea might rub people the wrong way... making it seem like a ploy to make finding that downvoting coward easier. That's not the point. The point is to force boards users with no rational argument to choose between a)hiding the irrationality of their opinion by not posting and b)undermining their own position by posting without a valid argument to present Essentially creating a "damned if you do and damned if you don't" situation for irrational posters.
Posts like
I downvoted 'cause this is dumb and unbalanced.
Are an intended result of such a change. Posters who post without having an argument to present just make their own position look bad. This disincentivizes those who know they have no argument from posting in the first place, raising the overall quality of the discussion by restricting it to only those who have an opinion they think is (and looks) rational.
[{quoted}](name=Metal Janna,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=BsqAv1Fj,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-03-31T08:26:01.139+0000)Are an intended result of such a change. Posters who post without having an argument to present just make their own position look bad. This disincentivizes those who know they have no argument from posting in the first place, raising the overall quality of the discussion by restricting it to only those who have an opinion they think is rational.
This is frustrating from a moderation perspective and leads to posts getting flooded with comments that serve only to make the poster look bad and flood the post with irrelevant comments. That's not a situation I feel is beneficial at all, especially as I don't believe people would hesitate to post largely off-topic things to access downvotes, and it encourages people jumping on them for low-value posts.
Bug? Yep bug. Whole OP vanished, can't read or edit it. When I try to edit it, I get "error fetching discussion to edit".
[{quoted}](name=Metal Janna,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=BsqAv1Fj,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-03-30T08:33:13.288+0000)
Bug? Yep bug. Whole OP vanished, can't read or edit it. When I try to edit it, I get "error fetching discussion to edit".
Probably cuz it got deleted by A: the mods or B: by the OP.
[{quoted}](name=Legend Alpha ,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=BsqAv1Fj,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-03-30T08:59:12.644+0000)
Probably cuz it got deleted by A: the mods or B: by the OP.
Wasn't deleted by me OR a mod. It was gone the instant I posted it. Could be an automated system. You'd think if posts had to be approved before appearing there'd be some notice though. Not "here's your topic, right out in the open but the main text field is empty". Just looks like a bug ate it to me. Screw it i'll just repost tomorrow and Ctrl+C this time in case it happens again.