Skip to content

Velkoz and Nami both have extra normal skins in skin selection.

MajorPain9··44 votes·3,670 views

Also if you use a emote for velkoz like laugh or dance, his little diagram that appears out of thin air bugs out and has the lettering appear above it if you do it after said laugh or dance.

32 Comments

Tentacle Love8 votes

Maybe it's a secret teaser for some new skins: Evil twin Nami Evil twin Vel'koz

X Frady2 votes

Vel'koz is already "evil". Good Twin Vel'koz maybe? :P

Major Sparkles2 votes

Vel'koz isn't evil per say. He's just, "learning."

ChrisB53 votes

In the eyes of most religions though, knowledge is evil... learning is a sin... Christianity being a huge offender in this case. So maybe in this sense, he's pure evil?

EDIT: THIS WAS A JOKE, grow up community of LoL. My God (uh oh, don't hang me on a cross for saying that), can we all calm down?

Major Sparkles3 votes

What kind of archaic form of medieval Christianity are you talking about? I'm a Christian and I have NEVER heard of knowledge being "sin." Anyway that's beyond the point. Vel'Koz is just a misunderstood good guy in my book.

Luner Hunter2 votes

salem witch trials anyone? said "blackmagic" was often just science (knowledge) that other people didn't understand and they burned or drown the "witch" also any scientific discovery that didn't follow the teachings of the church in the midevil days was HERESY and HERESY IS EVIL AND A SIN so back then KNOWLEDGE THE CHURCH DIDN'T AGREE WITH WAS A SIN AND EVIL

ElBoob2 votes

Let's not forget the fact that original sin was eating from the tree of knowledge.

Sammystorm2 votes

This isn't even a complete understanding of the Bible. Eve ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Not from the tree of knowledge. Their is a big difference. If you are going to attempt to prove a point based off of the source materiel at least know what the source materiel says.

ChrisB52 votes

Yet somehow incest isn't a sin... (if we all started from Adam and Eve, you do the math). Yea xD Oh and who gave humans free will? Not sure why Christians get so defensive... like, it was a joke. Oh well haha.

Sammystorm1 votes

It was a poorly framed joke then. It did not come across as joke and came across as a opinion that was not grounded in facts. A joke requires both parties to understand it.

You also tried to make excuses for your ignorant comments by putting the blame on Christians. Christians have a right to get defensive when your opinion does not represent facts and is offensive.

ChrisB51 votes

Did I say it was a good joke? My 'god,' grow up! :P

Sammystorm1 votes

Well it seems you do not care when you are being a dick or you are trolling. So I will just let you keep doing whatever it is you do.

ChrisB51 votes

Wow, can you act like an adult, or try to? Please stop being rude. You are a perfect example of what is wrong with the internet. Just because I make a joke that disproves of your every belief, I'm an asshole? Maybe every time I see a white person joke I should act like there's a fire ant up my ass. Kudos, man.

Sammystorm2 votes

Well you shouldn't just pull stuff out of your ass. Christians are in no way against knowledge or learning. In fact most Christians will encourage people to learn and become smarter. Just because Christians do not believe the theory of evolution does not make them anti-knowledge or even anti-science

Luner Hunter2 votes

salem witch trials anyone? said "blackmagic" was often just science (knowledge) that other people didn't understand and they burned or drown the "witch" also any scientific discovery that didn't follow the teachings of the church in the midevil days was HERESY and HERESY IS EVIL AND A SIN so back then KNOWLEDGE THE CHURCH DIDN'T AGREE WITH WAS A SIN AND EVIL

Sammystorm3 votes

People in the medieval era didn't believe the same stuff that people believe now. Doctors in that time frame believed that Leaches could cure diseases. Should we hold that viewpoint as relevant today, just because some people who were not as educated as we are today believed it? I mean that is what you are doing is you are making an assumption about a group of people you don't particularly understand based on an archaic almost universally disregarded teaching.

So let me ask you a few things. How are practices that have undisputedly been debunked hundreds of years ago relevant today? Another thing is just because certain people that claim to follow a religion do horrible things doesn't mean the religion condones that behavior. I mean in every group of people you can find crazy people that do horrible things.

Source materiel on why Christianity does not hate science or learning: Proverbs 1:5 ESV "Let the wise hear and increase in learning, and the one who understands obtain guidance,"

Proverbs 18:15 ESV An intelligent heart acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge.

Those are just a few examples.

ChrisB51 votes

Round Earth, Earth revolving the sun, two prime examples.

Sammystorm1 votes

Scientists have gotten things wrong countless times and believe those things as facts. For example Aristotle "debunked" Democritus idea that matter had one definite indivisible identity called an "atom"; instead he claimed that matter could be broken down indefinitely and that was believed to be true for thousands of years. However in the last hundred years with great advances in chemistry and science we have indeed found that Democritus was actually right and that the atom was the smallest piece of matter before we lost the matters identity. So having false theories that are widely believe is not unique to Christianity in any way. Yet people are very fond of holding it over Christians to show how ignorant their believes are, usually in regards to Darwinist Theory of Evolution and the wide spread lack of belief of that theory in the Christian community holds.

We can not fault people for making claims that were eventually proven wrong. We can however fault people for intentionally misleading people. Which can be problematic in religious and non-religious communities alike. However it is not fair to make claims about the entire community based on actions of a small minority of the population. An example: we can not fault soldiers fighting in the Iraq War. We however can fault the leader that made the decision. If Bush was found to be guilty of mis-leading the soldiers and public we should hold him accountable. In this scenario claiming that the soldiers were at fault would be similar to blaming the victim. No one should blame a victim of theft for being responsible for theft. Instead we should hold the thief accountable.

ChrisB51 votes

First off, that was a joke. But this is NOT true. The Earth being round, the Earth revolving around the sun, just two theories that the theorists were cast out for believing by the Christian community until much later after their deaths. Christianity preaches to not stray from the book, and essentially slave at God's will. Take Satan, an angel who just wanted an opinion. Free will was a gift from Satan himself. C'mon, open those eyes of yours and use your free will! Think for yourself. I'm not downing the religion, just being honest. Don't get so butthurt!

Sammystorm1 votes

you literally have no idea what Christianity preaches. It does not tell you to "stray from the book". In fact it consistently tells people to think and question the book because it claims that the Bible is completely true and therefor it will hold up to any scrutiny. It also does not once tell you to "slave at God's will". If you ask most Christians they will not claim they are slaving they will claim they were liberated by God's grace. Satan did not just want an opinion. Although the motives of Satan aren't entirely clear in the Bible it is apparent that their is a lot more going on other then just a lack of the ability to express opinion. Christianity does encourage free will and encourages individuality. It however does not condone sin. It defines sin as actions that miss the mark God has set for us or do break or cross the boundaries God has set for us. Now on top of that most of the Biblical principles set down in Christianity are widely accepted as good things. For example: Stealing is generally considered bad or wrong.

Now you can believe that free will is a gift from Satan and you are entitled to that opinion. However if you are referencing Satan as defined by the Bible you couldn't be more wrong. Satan in the Bible literally does not give any thing that is worth having. You are "downing" the religion and you are not being honest. You are making claims on your personal opinion without doing any research what so ever and claiming that opinion is fact. Being honest would require you to recognize that you have a very incomplete knowledge of what Christianity is. You are however not willing to do that which makes you seem very ignorant, very biased, and literally makes you come across as an ass. People aren't necessarily "butthurt" however that doesn't mean people have to put up with you spewing offensive non-sense just because you have the right to say it. Moral of the story this is the real world with people you do not know and people that do not know you which means you can not make any assumptions that they will understand what you are trying to say or that what you are saying will be well received. Nor can you just blow off legitimate complaints about your behavior as people being "butthurt". Basically, think before you say things. It usually works out better.

xGvPx1 votes

[{quoted}](name=X Frady,realm=NA,application-id=LqLKtMpN,discussion-id=wEUz6oRO,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2015-02-09T00:07:03.674+0000)

Vel'koz is already "evil". Good Twin Vel'koz maybe? :P

What's the deal with Arclight? Like for Varus, it was when he wasn't consumed by darkness...but for Vel Koz? I mean, can a void monster be good? Are any of them "good?" Or I guess, why did Vel Koz get an Arclight?

X Frady1 votes

You're asking me that? I know squat about the reasons. Rito can provide a better answer.

xGvPx1 votes

[{quoted}](name=X Frady,realm=NA,application-id=LqLKtMpN,discussion-id=wEUz6oRO,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2015-02-09T04:24:44.065+0000)

You're asking me that? I know squat about the reasons. Rito can provide a better answer.

The way they butcher lore, it seems like the fans know more about it than Rito ;P

AFK Push2 votes

{quoted}

What's the deal with Arclight? Like for Varus, it was when he wasn't consumed by darkness...but for Vel Koz? I mean, can a void monster be good? Are any of them "good?" Or I guess, why did Vel Koz get an Arclight?

Sometimes they just make a skin because it looks cool. Yep, that's it. Mind=blown.

Vesarixx2 votes

It's another free skin riot is giving out, traditional Nami/Vel'koz

RoyaiChaos1 votes

Yi had this too a while back, but I think it's been fixed for him.

trexmixG1 votes

wtf classic vel koz is the best

Danica17081 votes

Also, when I play Nami in Team Builder, I can't use my River Spirit Nami skin more than once. If I try to play a second game, I get switched to her classic skin, even if I reselect River Spirit.

Sinspunch1 votes

Ive seen these bugs before. I still see them.

Sammystorm1 votes

Jinx has an extra skin in loading

TheFameAnimal1 votes

{quoted}

Jinx has an extra skin in loading

Yeah, that's firecracker Jinx :D

Cyvv Fireheart1 votes

I can confirm the Vel'Koz double classic skin. Attached is a pic of it in team builder.

More from Report a Bug

More by MajorPain9