junglers, your the reason your team lost.

devante gomez·7/24/2015, 2:58:13 AM·2 votes·838 views

over the course of many games, i have realised that 50% of the losses i suffered, occurred because, a jungler told my team to get dragon, rather that rush the open inhib and win the game.

so to rectify this i challenge . all junglers, to not go for dargon, 50 minutes into the game, and instead encourage your team to siege the enemy. do this for a month, and if u don't experience a rise, in victories. then i shall uninstall. of this u have my word,

up vote so i can get more opinions, maybe ill change my mid.

12 Comments

Truely Fabulous7/25/2015, 5:46:48 PM3 votes

Good lord man take a spelling class. Also, your jg might have been making the right call by going for drag. i.e.: top inhib or 5th drag? 5th drag not even close.

Lugg7/25/2015, 10:05:34 PM3 votes

If your team is stupid enough to prioritize a dragon over an inhib, you deserve to lose. EVERY good team takes the inhib and then retreats back to the dragon and takes it.

Snowball4u7/24/2015, 3:01:24 AM1 votes

jungle is the high risk high reward.

you have the most potential to make plays, and the most potential to screw up.

i just hate it when people talk about missing smites on baron or dragon. if your smite does 1000 damage, the goal is to smite at EXACTLY 1000. NOT 900 or lower. because that give the other jungler an oppertinuty to smite.

and if you still dont think its that hard, why the fuck do you think piglet is able to steal baron with an ability that does about 300 damage?

joebobby14127/25/2015, 4:00:41 AM1 votes

Okay, when I saw that post title, I thought you would have some stupid ADC point of view. You have a valid point, those junglers made the wrong call (sort of). However, dragon is SUPER important in the game. Not every dragon and baron call is going to be the right call, but if the jungler never makes those calls, they aren't doing their job. If you really think something is a bad idea, tell your team in chat. Don't follow them.

Now, what I meant by "sort of": Taking an inhib is better than a dragon, taking dragon is better than seiging the enemy. If the enemy is dead and you can end, end. If not, I would say the priorities are multiple inhibs>baron>one inhib>dragon. The other thing to note with this is sometimes you could take multiple of those objectives. You could take an inhib AND dragon.

You muddle up what you are saying when you say "rush the open inhib" and "seige the enemy".

Their Jungler7/25/2015, 4:09:15 AM1 votes

This is why you are in Bronze 5

Darknixx7/25/2015, 3:53:41 PM1 votes

Why would you listen then. Take over as the shotcaller. You want to take over? Show those homies, peeps, and bros how good you are.