Tft is literally unenjoyable.

{quoted}

No. You're looking at it wrong.

No one can win this game 100% of the time or even thereabouts. If they do, then they are following an exact and repeatable recipe to do it. This game is more about decision-making, so action components do not apply like they would in SR.

So how do you keep people from winning 100% of the time? RNG. And how do you deal with RNG from there? Find elements that keep people in constant chaos at the top (items) while keeping open options and fluid movement at lower tiers of winrate (not giving everyone only one meta to follow, aka items).

So if you're winning 75% of the time and struggling due to items at the top 25%, then you found the control for your winrate. And that's totally fine. It keeps YOU from being top dog always because 100% win or thereabouts is not an option. Anything that gives you more control to win more games at the top margin gives you and other people paying attention fool-proof strategies to win way more often at the bottom margin by playing into it.

Giving you and everyone items at the start makes item scrambles and strategy the dominant force of winning; not limiting items on players in the early phase and/or throughout the entire match

I should be losing because the opponent outplayed me with clever positioning and good usage of units, not sheer amounts of items.

{quoted}

Until you face people of equal skill, so win 50% or more basically. Which anyone can do. And then from there, that 50-70% win rate has other factors. And items may well be the current final factor, which I think is intended. So maybe items inhibit you when you're at higher win rates, but that's more manageable than making them a dominant force in the early game, too. Which is why not everyone is getting items, or as many.

The problem with that is once you get a lot of people within x% of eachothers skill (and x is a large number as it increases the more RNG there is) the less balance and less control you have over play.

Think of it this way. People talk about who is the best player in a region, or in the world in league and it's a small group of people. But with this much RNG it's impossible to tell the top 10% apart. So once you get to E-Sports (which Riot wants) for example, you don't have the best vs the best, you just have a random pool of the top 10% of players all praying they get the better RNG as they're otherwise pretty equal all things considered.

Basically, it comes down to two things. Knowledge (not a lot is needed in TFT, maybe a month of going at it hard learning) and ability to scout all your opponents fast enough. That may take a bit longer and is in no way fun (IMO). Since there's no direct control, anyone that masters scouting (again IMO amounts to running around like a headless chicken, but to each their own) will all be equal. The number of people that will be capable of this is limited, but it's fair to say at least the top 10% will all be able to. The only thing left at that point is RNG of which there's a LOT, and it's too big of a factor for proper "E-sports".

Sure you can be competitive, but the game mechanics simply don't allow for a pro environment.

{quoted}

You're identifying elements of RNG and trying to connect them to elements of strategy adversely. You're isolating exactly one strategy and saying it's the only one on the table.

You do not have control over Item drops Card drops Who you fight (except the game tries to match you with equal outcomes OR quick executions to avoid redundancy)

You DO have control over What comps you want to build with what is given (enhanced by spatula) What buffs you want to add with what you have (enhanced by items/spatula) What comps you want to max with what's given Whether you want to farm gold hard or flip cards to build your team (and when and in what order you choose this) What pocket items and backline backups you're building into (spatula hoarding = pocket synergy as well) What neutral picks you will put out to get an extra buff, such as a Ninja or a two-person synergy And what synergies you try to buff with other synergies (more of a strat with what you're given).

So, to be clear, I have listed exactly 3 things you DO NOT have control over, that are based "100%" on RNG

And I have listed exactly SEVEN things you DO have control over that are based 100% on what you do with what you're given.

All I can figure from this item complaint is that people want to walk into every game playing exactly the same strategy, and having no control over items totally blocks that method of play. And I support that. YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO CHANGE DIRECTIONS AT ANY GIVEN PASS, and that is based on the decisions you made up to any given point, which identifies skill more than whether or not you got X item and better than just giving everyone an item to "balance" your losses supposedly due to the state of items/distribution.

As an aside, I have noticed that generally when you're facing #1 or someone else high up several times, the game is weeding out redundancy. Why make you play against 2nd place when you'll also lose? So it puts you up against first place, maybe in a ghost match (the other player isn't there effectively). If you can't beat first, you can't win. Though it is a bit more complicated than that.

What you have "control" over is what you are limited by because of the RNG. It's making the best of a bad situation. You even list "what is given" and "what you have" repeatedly in your list.

And people are complaining that too many people are doing the same thing, which right now is get pyke, stack spear of shojin.