Majority for All for One mode should be 4 out of 5

Zeal Seeker·10/16/2015, 12:56:53 AM·2 votes·373 views

Why is 3 out of 5 the majority for picking when 4 out of 5 has always been considered the majority vote for things like forfeiting. I am a solo player, I enjoy playing the game by myself and making my own decisions. I feel like I should be entitled to a voice when 2/5 and 3/5 are 40% and 60% respectively, which is not really calling it majority in my opinion. If 3 people wants to play one champion, and 2 people wants to play a different champion, the difference is only 20%, why make it 100%? I do not think that it is fair.

1 Comments

sdrawkcaB10/19/2015, 6:55:58 PM1 votes

I completely agree.

I just played a game with my friend, but we got queued up with 3 premade guys; a 100% guarantee that me and my friend could not play a champ we wanted to play. Besides, the surrender system also works in a way that 4/5 people need to agree to actually surrender. It's very non consistent of Riot to make the All for One system like this and it takes away most of the fun of this game mode.