Why not iron?

Rebonack·4/11/2017, 7:39:59 AM·1 votes·602 views

Whenever a fantasy setting gets some form of innately magic-resistant material it almost always ends up being something strange and exotic. Sometimes a super-rare metal. Sometimes a spooky crystal of some kind. Sometimes a fancy rock. Petrified trees are certainly a new one (wouldn't mind hearing a why on the magic-sucking property some day).

But almost inevitably, the oldest standby for anti-magical material gets passed over.

Good old fashioned iron.

So I'm curious as a result. Did the topic of iron's anti-magic properties in folklore ever come up in the discussion? Was it seen as just too mundane a foil for magic? Because, honestly, its mundaness is exactly why it's such a great foil for magic. You could pretty easily take it a step further and say that while all iron has some degree of magic resistance this one special type of iron (sun-steel?) is extra special.

Iron has a few thousand years of narrative power behind its magic-thwarting properties, why not take advantage of that?

5 Comments

Sharjo4/11/2017, 7:49:50 AM7 votes

Because iron's such a commonly used metal that basically every human nation would then have access to anti-magic weapons and armour? Which kinda makes you wonder why anyone ever went to war with magic and didn't instead just batter down the walls of any sorcerous nation with a legion of steel-clad soldiers?

Khâmul4/11/2017, 7:56:17 AM2 votes

Mordekaiser You don't need magic armor to kill thousands of people.If they're dead,they can't harm you. If they're by your side (consent not needed),it's much better

FloRaider424/11/2017, 8:37:03 PM1 votes

But isn't iron a rather weak magic repellent ? As far as I am aware it only repels fairies and ghosts, which might help in daily life, but if someone is firing a fireball at you a magic-absorbing material is much better. So maybe Iron has some magic resistant properties, but if you can afford it there are far better materials at hand.