Let me know if I took this out of context
"...killed a ton of people. But killing [for fun] doesn't necessarily equate to Evil."
So... Killing a ton of people is not.. Evil..? I would wholly recommend you stay out of the public and seek medical attention, if you believe your own words.
But lets talk DnD alignments. The PHB does not define alignments at all, so the task is up to us!
She has no allegiance and have neither good nor evil intentions
Please, define what is 'Evil'. "Murdering because its a fun thing to do" certainly meets a criteria of 'evil' in my definition. Your interpretation of 'Chaotic Evil' seems strictly niched into 'Saturday Cartoon Villain'. Hell, but even Skeletor laughs and giggles as he murders innocents, "Naw, hes just a silly billy chaotic neutral with a quirk of murder". If only Hitler had a big 'ol smile and danced to a jaunty tune as he sent Jews into a cooker, then he would not been seen as a historical icon of evil but a chaotic neutral whos merely enjoying himself.
**You seem to excuse collateral damage crimes and crimes of passion from being 'evil' or 'bad' because they were not premeditated. **
After so many DnD game sessions of pointless arguing Ive come to the conclusion that *Role Playing Games *are better off with out an enforced alignment system. Heres why, There is soooo much grey area. Lets go with a simple hypothetical: Killing is bad. Right? Well, not necessarily. Killing in battle is not considered bad. Killing because of justice isnt bad. Killing from mercy is not bad. So then what is bad, what is evil? Is evil only if you self identify as evil? Hitler never sat atop a perch and scream "Go Forth My Minions! MuHaHaHa" while twirling a mustache. Hitler (in his own minds eye) thought he was doing the right thing for his country and his people. So is evil a matter of perception? The English saw George Washington as a traitor who rebelled against his homeland and murdered his kinfolk. The victors write the history books so does that make the losers evil if the winners said they were? What about cause and effect? What if you intended to do good but it ended up doing evil? Are you evil? What if you intended to do an evil act but it ended up being seen as a good one in public opinion? Does public opinion determine what is 'good' or 'evil'? Then the minority will always be seen as evil if they do not conform. This is all just a fragment of one alignment and it is only a plethora of debate and grey area that ultimately never comes to a conclusion.
Here is how I come to see the 5 alignments:
Law vs Chaos. They have nothing to do with city regulations or 'following the rules'. It is a question of "Do you have a personal code?" lupin the third is a thief who is lawful, imo. Although he steals, he has a very strict set of codes he follows.
Good vs Evil. Evil will take from society (or those around them) and give to themselves meanwhile dogooders will take from themselves and give to society (or those around them). The only meager way I found a satisfactory definition of 'What is Evil or Good?' is selfishness or selflessness.
Neutrals are those that do not have strong convictions to any set of morals and/or are easily persuaded/gullible and tend to be very wishy washy on the alignment spectrum.
True Neutral if you are a lame druid (I honestly had a friend that thought True Neutral was a 'freedom of alignment' and meant he can do w/e the fuck he wanted without consequences).
TLDR: What does the word Evil truly mean?