''Artbook'' Disappointed me

ArdoreAurorale·9/6/2016, 10:16:58 AM·3 votes·1,479 views

this is not an ''artbook''. this is an insult to what artbooks really are.

at first i was excited too, but then i noticed that it's just a lean bunch of Fan-arts (aesthetically pleasing at first but nothing more to show the deep essence of the character), some scraps, splasharts (wooh..), and old images that can be easily found around the internet, with few pointless chit-chats sticked on it. (just annie, mf storyboards and a few ekko drawings are worth enough)

are you being serious on what you deliver to players? i feel them resting on their laurels, being lazier the more time passes, both art and lore sides.

indeed, since the Lore situation is not solid atm, inevitably the art side is not strong enough to hold on and show an universe that it's currently stunted, unconsistent, not cohesive with itself. Do you want an example to prove it? just take a look at Magic:The Gathering artbooks, bioshock infinite, etc. etc. LoL's is 1/10 of them in terms of contents.

So why did you make this artbook, so lean and premature? of course because other companies are doing it, let's follow them.

And, in the end, $75 DOLLARS for the printed version?! 75 Damned hard-earned dollars (or 67 euros, at today's exchange in my country) for this, forgive my words, crap? (meanwhile all the other artbooks i found weren't this expensive.) just dowload it the PDF and print it by yourself at this point.

I Loved the ''Music of Legends Vol. I'' but this time, i'm sorry, honestly the ''Art of Legends Vol I'', you misfired.

0 Comments