Discussion VS Chronological View
Until today I did not know there was a chronological view, and I only discovered it by turning it on by accident. It is nice, but having both discussion and chronological view seems to be causing some problems. Depending on what view you are in a thread could appear to be a coherent talk between people, or a random mess of points and replies that do not connect to one another.
A few threads in particular have had, in discussion view, a few discussions with everything tabbed correctly followed by a series of one off posts that only make sense in chronological view. I can see the merits of both view styles, but the two do not mesh particularly well with one another.
GD only appears to have chronological view available, and that makes it's threads both consistent and as easy to follow as a GD thread can be. Perhaps more boards should have a forced view, or maybe people who create threads should be given the option to decide which will be forced in their thread. I can personally make due with either view, but consistency would be a wonderful addition.